Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is pretty cool to know. Thanks. But this requires appending "&>
> /dev/pts/1" to each and every command. Can this be done in some
> configuration file so that it works for each and every command?
Can't you just do something like:
exec >&
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:32, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:21, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:02 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > > I really miss one feature from all these applications. I would like
> > > to have two terminals open sid
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:21, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:02 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > I really miss one feature from all these applications. I would like to
> > have two terminals open side by side. All the input goes to one terminal,
> > all the output (and
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:02:55PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> On Monday 01 January 2007 05:51, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
>
> > I do not use KDE, but found this interesting.
> >
> > http://nomis80.org/
> >
> > From the description:
> > QuadKonsole is a program which embeds 4 Konsoles (othe
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:02 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> I really miss one feature from all these applications. I would like to have
> two terminals open side by side. All the input goes to one terminal, all the
> output (and errors if there are any) comes up in the second terminal.
> Cli
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:36:16PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Is the "Menu Bar" supposed to be a box or not?
> Shows up like this in my 'Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
> rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0':
> http://www.geocities.com/hugovanwoerkom/robertos_page.jpeg
>
Yes. It
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Naturally, since he provided *zero* substantiation for his position (if
you could even call it that), I asked if he had in fact used it. Now, I
don't consider
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A good place to start learning would be by reading bug reports for
>> gnome-terminal (some are older than your cited experience, but each
>> release of gnome-terminal produces new and interesting bugs).
> Interesting. I guess the word regression d
On Monday 01 January 2007 05:51, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> I do not use KDE, but found this interesting.
>
> http://nomis80.org/
>
> From the description:
> QuadKonsole is a program which embeds 4 Konsoles (other numbers can be
> specified on the command-line). This way you save screen real es
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:55:00AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd be ineterested to learn more. I have been using gnome-terminal
> > nearly every day since I started using Debian in late 2002. I have had
> > very few issues with gnome-terminal.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:03:59PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >> It appears you didn't read the whole thread (one's mentioned ;-).
> > I did. Jerome's single problem was mention
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> It appears you didn't read the whole thread (one's mentioned ;-).
> I did. Jerome's single problem was mentioned in a reply to a reply to
> Marc's message. Marc never provided why he
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be ineterested to learn more. I have been using gnome-terminal
> nearly every day since I started using Debian in late 2002. I have had
> very few issues with gnome-terminal.
>From what I read on google, you're an end-user of gnome-terminal, an
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 08:08:25PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Have *you* ever used it?
>
> Yes, unfortunately I have. Its poor-at-best terminal emulation means I
> never will again.
>
> There's no reason to use anything oth
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Have *you* ever used it?
Yes, unfortunately I have. Its poor-at-best terminal emulation means I
never will again.
There's no reason to use anything other than xterm.
--
Marc Wilson | That money talks, I'll not deny, I h
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Naturally, since he provided *zero* substantiation for his position (if
> > you could even call it that), I asked if he had in fact used it. Now, I
> > don't consider that bouncing em
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Naturally, since he provided *zero* substantiation for his position (if
> you could even call it that), I asked if he had in fact used it. Now, I
> don't consider that bouncing email around. He did not provide a single
> point why gnome-terminal was
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:09:45PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have *you* ever used it?
>
> He stated that he had. Perhaps when your reading comprehension improves a
> little beyond bouncing email around, you will enlighten us on why
> gnome
Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, R
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Why not just use gnome-terminal?
>
> Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal? 'Nuff said.
>
Sure. I use it every day even though I am a WindowMaker user. I wish
th
Jerome BENOIT writes:
> Hello,
> this one:
> PS1='\[\033]0;$NICKNAME:\w\007\]\[\033[40;1;37m\]$NICKNAME>\[\033[0;m\] '
Yes, I see garbled characters in gnome-terminal after NICKNAME>. E.g.:
foo>^[[0;m
I tried with konsole and your escape sequence works fine there.
>>> Why my escape sequence w
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:40:40AM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
>
> I use konsole all the time. It does not have all the features that
> multi-gnome-terminal has. For example multi-gnome-terminal has facilities
to
> split the screen horizontally and vertically. Other than funky
Hello,
this one:
PS1='\[\033]0;$NICKNAME:\w\007\]\[\033[40;1;37m\]$NICKNAME>\[\033[0;m\] '
Jerome
Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote:
Jerome BENOIT writes:
Why my escape sequence which works fine on xterm does not work with
gnome-terminal ?
Which escape sequence are you using?
--
Jerome BEN
Jerome BENOIT writes:
> Why my escape sequence which works fine on xterm does not work with
> gnome-terminal ?
Which escape sequence are you using?
--
-- Jhair
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 31 December 2006 13:24, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Is there any good alternative, patches or workarounds ?
>
I use konsole all the time. It does not have all the features that
multi-gnome-terminal has. For example multi-gnome-terminal has facilities to
split the screen horizontally and ve
Hello Folks,
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hello Marc.
Marc Wilson, 01.01.2007 01:57:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Why not just use gnome-terminal?
Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal?
I did and do and I’m happy with it.
'Nuff said.
I don’t think so. Ple
Hello Marc.
Marc Wilson, 01.01.2007 01:57:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> Why not just use gnome-terminal?
>
> Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal?
I did and do and I’m happy with it.
> 'Nuff said.
I don’t think so. Please explain.
Regards, Mathias
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Why not just use gnome-terminal?
Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal? 'Nuff said.
--
Marc Wilson | Modesty: The gentle art of enhancing your charm by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pretending not to be aware of it. -- Oliver
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:24:27AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have just tried Multi-Gnome-Terminal on my new x86_64 box:
> it appears the terminal is filled with arbitrary caracters
> [ bug #345504 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345504
>
> Is there any good
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 07:46:48PM +0100, Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote:
> Jerome BENOIT writes:
>
> > Is there any good alternative, patches or workarounds ?
>
> Maybe set the bug severity to critical? The program is unusable and
> not suitable for release.
>
No!!!
Please think about wh
Jerome BENOIT writes:
> Hello List,
> I have just tried Multi-Gnome-Terminal on my new x86_64 box:
> it appears the terminal is filled with arbitrary caracters
> [ bug #345504 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345504
I can reproduce this with
Package: multi-gnome-terminal
Version
31 matches
Mail list logo
