Great, that was it! One of the plugins I installed from Mozdev was 600.
Changing it to 644 gave me my menus and context menus back!
Thanks for you help!
Michael
Santiago Hirschfeld wrote:
> You should check for file permisions in /usr/lib/mozilla/chrome and see if
> that all .jar files are at le
You should check for file permisions in /usr/lib/mozilla/chrome and see if
that all .jar files are at least as -rw-r--r--. Let me know if it works.
good luck
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:51:24AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Michael Bona wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla
Michael Bona wrote:
Hi,
I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla (1.0 on Woody) as Root is
fine. Starting it as a user produces a Mozilla window without top menu,
context menue and no tabs.
Any help? Thanks!
Michael
It's probably something in your prefs.js file. I'd exit Moz, then rename
Michael Bona wrote:
Hi,
I am having a strange problem: Running Mozilla (1.0 on Woody) as Root is
fine. Starting it as a user produces a Mozilla window without top menu,
context menue and no tabs.
Any help? Thanks!
Michael
1- It's probably your profile which is bad. Create a new one (that's the
Hi Ron,
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 22:50 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > > > Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
> > >
> > > Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discuss
> > > soundcard-reated problems?
> > >
> > > I may misunderstood your arguement.
> >
> > Hes is/was trying to be funny/o
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 14:56, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Gerhard Gaussling([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 19:35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> >
> > > Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
> >
> > Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discu
Gerhard Gaussling([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 19:35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
>
> > Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
>
> Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discuss
> soundcard-reated problems?
>
> I may misunderstood your
Hi Ron,
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 19:35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> Not all of us have/want sound cards!!!
Of course! Is there a problem in this list to discuss
soundcard-reated problems?
I may misunderstood your arguement.
regards
gerhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 10:43, René Seindal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 23:31 schrieb Richard Beri:
[snip]
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148219 which appears to
> related to some problem with flash and soun
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 17:43 schrieb René Seindal:
> Do you think this is related to
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148219 which appears
> to related to some problem with flash and sound. The bug is not
> reproduceable by all. It still happens to me, starting from
> Mozilla
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 23:31 schrieb Richard Beri:
> > I tried the "dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser" and set the audio
> > to "none" but mozilla was still crashing. Right now I have just
> > disabled the kde artsd server alt
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 23:31 schrieb Richard Beri:
> I tried the "dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser" and set the audio
> to "none" but mozilla was still crashing. Right now I have just
> disabled the kde artsd server altogether and mozilla is stable.
> Granted I have no sound in kde, but I can
I tried the "dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser" and set the audio to
"none" but mozilla was still crashing. Right now I have just disabled
the kde artsd server altogether and mozilla is stable. Granted I have
no sound in kde, but I can still play mp3's with xmms, and hear sound
in movies in xi
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 03:51, Oleg wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:12 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> > >My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones
> > > and zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up
> > > for political reasons, since Mozilla is
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 03:51, Oleg wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:12 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> > >My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones
> > > and zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up
> > > for political reasons, since Mozilla is
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:58 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> lynx beats them all for straight text. try nested tables, javascript,
> anigifs, and flash plugins on the same page.
>
> Thats when you find out what your browser's worth
>
> YMMV yourself, but my job takes me to these monstrosities all the
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 03:53 schrieb Richard Beri:
> Interesting, you are right. If I kill the artsd sound server
> mozilla clears itself up and that page will load without a
> problem when I reload mozilla, if I disable the artsd (kde sound
> server). So the dpkg -reconfigure doesn't help?
Thanks, this seems to work!
.
>
> You can try to dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser to stop Mozilla
> from grabbing esd.
>
> Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(I repeated the whole experiment twice for each browser, starting them
before
>and shutting them down after the experiment)
>
>HW: K6-2 550 w/ 256 MB (Java disabled in Netscape. Don't know about
Mozilla -
>whichever way it comes on Woody)
first problem, woody's version isn't close to the 1.0 re
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 10:12 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> >My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones
> > and zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up
> > for political reasons, since Mozilla is thought of as IE's competitor on
> > Windows.
> >
>My theory is that others experience the same (after all, it's just ones and
>zeros, not weather forcasting), but everyone is afraid to speak up for
>political reasons, since Mozilla is thought of as IE's competitor on Windows.
>
>End of troll. Dictated, but not read. YMMV IFF you are a lying SOB
People keep claiming that they are improving Mozilla and that it's not
Slow-zilla any more, but it has always been my experience, regardless of
Mozilla's version or hardware, that it is at least 2 or 3 times slower than
other browsers (Netscape 4.7 on Linux and IE on Windows)
My theory is that
Interesting, you are right. If I kill the artsd sound server mozilla
clears itself up and that page will load without a problem when I
reload mozilla, if I disable the artsd (kde sound server). So the dpkg
-reconfigure doesn't help?
On June 11, 2002 03:30 pm, gerhard wrote:
> Hi Dave, Hi fol
At 07:53 PM 6/11/02 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>On 11/06/02 John Griffiths did speaketh:
>
>> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
>> potato?
>
>You might want to just grab the binary tarball from the Mozilla website.
>
>Mike
Thanks Mike,
I used t
On 11/06/02 John Griffiths did speaketh:
> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
> potato?
You might want to just grab the binary tarball from the Mozilla website.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HA
Hi Dave, Hi folks,
Am Dienstag, 11. Juni 2002 06:09 schrieb Dave Thayer:
> This page has a flash plugin in it. There are several mentions of
> problems with flash problems in the moz release notes. In
> particular, the flash plugin doesn't seem to share the audio
> device nicely.
You're right, M
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:09:11PM -0400, Oleg wrote:
> Please keep debian-user@lists.debian.org in "Cc" or "To" headers, so we can
> sort mail efficiently.
Sorting mail on either of those is unreliable anyway. Using the
X-Mailing-List: header works better for Debian lists.
--
Colin Watson
Please keep debian-user@lists.debian.org in "Cc" or "To" headers, so we can
sort mail efficiently.
Oleg
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 02:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:16:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i'm not positive how to reproduce it, but i did figure out that
> mozilla was blocking while trying to talk to esd. killing esd freed
> it up and let it run. i've had trouble with esd blocking things up
> before, especially gqmp
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:36:40AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 21:57, Richard Beri wrote:
> > Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in
Sid?
> > So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this
problem
> > with RC1-3 and thought that 1.
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 21:57, Richard Beri wrote:
> > Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
> > So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
> > with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 21:57, Richard Beri wrote:
> Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
> So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
> with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
> Try http://www.radiocontro
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:57:53PM -0400, Richard Beri wrote:
> Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
> So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
> with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
> Try http://ww
briliant
didn't realise ximinan had done this.
thanks!
At 11:48 AM 6/11/02 +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:27, John Griffiths wrote:
>> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
>> potato?
>
>If you're talking about ready-to-install de
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:27, John Griffiths wrote:
> on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
> potato?
If you're talking about ready-to-install debs of Moz 1.0, you can check
out Ximian GNOME's debs for Mozilla. Add the line
deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian
on the subject of moz, does anyone know of any debs for 1.0 suitable for
potato?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Beri wrote:
Am I the only person getting Mozilla 1.0 to crash all the time in Sid?
So many different pages it just locks up. I was having this problem
with RC1-3 and thought that 1.0final would clear it up but it hasn't.
Try http://www.radiocontrolledclock.com and thats just the ti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeronimo Pellegrini) writes:
> > According to a comment on DP.org, the security patches will be applied
> > to the version currently in woody (0.9.9, I think) instead of uploading
> > a whole new version.
>
> What about non-security fixes? There was a lot of bug-fixing before
>
> According to a comment on DP.org, the security patches will be applied
> to the version currently in woody (0.9.9, I think) instead of uploading
> a whole new version.
What about non-security fixes? There was a lot of bug-fixing before
1.0...
J.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
"J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 13:38:52 -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> > Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
> > frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
> > release?
>
> It is a virtual ce
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 13:38:52 -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
> frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
> release?
It is a virtual certainty that 3.0 will not be released with the mozilla
that's c
Hi Bryan,
Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Now that Mozilla 1.0 has been released, and Debian 3.0 is stuck in a
> frozen state, is there anyway that we can sneak Mozilla 1.0 into the
> release? It would be a shame to release Debian 3.0 in the next couple
> of weeks and not include Moz 1.0.
No way.
wood
42 matches
Mail list logo
