Kamil Jońca composed on 2022-12-07 09:16 (UTC+0100):
> gene heskett wrote:
>> Am I to add these below? According to the top of the file, t-bird must
>> be stopped before editing as it saves this anew when stopping.
>> user_pref("mail.quoteasblock", false);
>> user_pref("mail.quot
D&P Dimov writes:
> And since you mentioned that you wouldn't sign up for it, do you have another
> VPN
> provider/service that you would recommend that works in Debian Buster
> (stable) with just free
> software?
I've used AirVPN before (https://airvpn.org/), they have a web page for
generati
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 5:43:25 AM EST, Anssi Saari
wrote:
Brian writes:
> On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 18:04:28 +, D&P Dimov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
>> work on Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on
Brian writes:
> On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 18:04:28 +, D&P Dimov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
>> work on Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian.
>> Has anyone tried? (The Mozilla support was not helpful in answering my
On 26/02/2021 21:27, Dan Ritter wrote:
> D&P Dimov wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 26, 2021, 3:16:03 PM EST, Dan Ritter
>> wrote:
>> D&P Dimov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will work on
>>> Debian as well, considering that Ubintu i
D&P Dimov wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 26, 2021, 3:16:03 PM EST, Dan Ritter
> wrote:
> D&P Dimov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will work on
> > Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian. Has anyone
> > tried? (The
D&P Dimov wrote:
> Hello,
> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will work on
> Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian. Has anyone tried?
> (The Mozilla support was not helpful in answering my question).
What protocol is the Mozilla VPN? Most common
On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 18:04:28 +, D&P Dimov wrote:
> Hello,
> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
> work on Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian.
> Has anyone tried? (The Mozilla support was not helpful in answering my
> question).
Nothing
On 2015-08-07 17:08:51 -0400, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 22:31:15 +0200
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > And Firefox cannot play some videos on Debian due to bug 729251.
>
> Found an easy way to keep up to date with Mozilla (who BTW are very
> good at letting you know a newer version
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 22:31:15 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Looks like Jessie is not vulnerable.
>
> But this is an old version. :(
>
> And unfortunately the sid version, which is also fixed, is not
> installable due to the libstdc++6 transition, which doesn't seem
> to have much progress:
>
On 2015-08-07 13:34:48 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/iceweasel
>
> Looks like Jessie is not vulnerable.
But this is an old version. :(
And unfortunately the sid version, which is also fixed, is not
installable due to the libstdc++6 transiti
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 13:44 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> does anyone have news from debian security regarding the exploit
> on
> Iceweasel/Firefox that's been on the news recently?
>
> I'm wondering if I should just wait for the update or just skip
> it and
> updat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/07/2015 12:44 PM, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> does anyone have news from debian security regarding the exploit
> on Iceweasel/Firefox that's been on the news recently?
>
> I'm wondering if I should just wait for the update or
On Fri 13 Feb 2015 at 10:18:10 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-02-13, Charles Blair wrote:
> > I tinkered with "Preferences/Applications". Did not
> > do anything about a special kind of Preference. If
> > this message gets posted, the thing worked :)
> >
> >If so, thanks!
> >
>
> I never cli
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:18:10AM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-02-13, Charles Blair wrote:
> > I tinkered with "Preferences/Applications". Did not
> > do anything about a special kind of Preference. If
> > this message gets posted, the thing worked :)
> >
> >If so, thanks!
> >
>
> I never
On 2015-02-13, Charles Blair wrote:
> I tinkered with "Preferences/Applications". Did not
> do anything about a special kind of Preference. If
> this message gets posted, the thing worked :)
>
>If so, thanks!
>
I never click on those mailto links myself, but I followed my own advice
for onc
On Thu 12 Feb 2015 at 18:01:48 -0600, Charles Blair wrote:
> I tinkered with "Preferences/Applications". Did not
> do anything about a special kind of Preference. If
> this message gets posted, the thing worked :)
>
>If so, thanks!
We would have guess what form your tinkering took. :)
For
I tinkered with "Preferences/Applications". Did not
do anything about a special kind of Preference. If
this message gets posted, the thing worked :)
If so, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
On Thu 12 Feb 2015 at 17:42:56 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-02-12, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 12 Feb 2015 at 08:41:00 -0600, Charles Blair wrote:
> >
> >>I use claws-mail for e-mail. When I am running iceweasel/mozilla
> >> and click on a mailto: link, no window for claws-mail is opened.
> >
>
On 2015-02-12, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 12 Feb 2015 at 08:41:00 -0600, Charles Blair wrote:
>
>>I use claws-mail for e-mail. When I am running iceweasel/mozilla
>> and click on a mailto: link, no window for claws-mail is opened.
>
> A script, mailto-claws:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> claws-mail --comp
On 2015-02-12, Charles Blair wrote:
>I use claws-mail for e-mail. When I am running iceweasel/mozilla
> and click on a mailto: link, no window for claws-mail is opened.
>
>
In Preferences/Applications search 'mailto' as a Content Type and
there's a dropdown menu with choices for Actions whe
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:41:00 -0600,
Charles Blair wrote:
> I use claws-mail for e-mail. When I am running iceweasel/mozilla
>and click on a mailto: link, no window for claws-mail is opened.
>
>
Which desktop environment? You might have forgotten what is called
"Preferred Applications" in Xfce
On Thu 12 Feb 2015 at 08:41:00 -0600, Charles Blair wrote:
>I use claws-mail for e-mail. When I am running iceweasel/mozilla
> and click on a mailto: link, no window for claws-mail is opened.
A script, mailto-claws:
#!/bin/bash
claws-mail --compose "$1"
Use the script for "mailto" in P
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:40:02 +0200
"tv.deb...@googlemail.com" wrote:
> You can get Iceweasel 17 esr from http://mozilla.debian.net/ without a
> sweat, I run it on my amd64 testing systems right now.
OK thanks for this, I'll have a look.
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
> But regarding to updates the management by ports for a FreeBSD noop
> like me is a PITA and btw. I also prefer binaries to compiling _really
> everything_ from source. Theoretically you can manage FreeBSD by a
> package management that does provide binaries too, but when I
> installed FreeBSD the
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 16:51 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > Breaking the system because Arch haven't tested it well enough, or
> > > released the right information happened atleast three times in the 6
> > > months that I used it.
> >
> > It only happened one time for me, when they switched f
> > Breaking the system because Arch haven't tested it well enough, or
> > released the right information happened atleast three times in the 6
> > months that I used it.
>
> It only happened one time for me, when they switched from init to
> systemd I dropped Arch for perhaps a year. But with D
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 15:16 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Arch has some good plus points such as a very fast package manager
IMO the easiest to use package management, at least by comparison with
RPM and DEP. Learning how to build Debian packages does takes a while
and you'll forget how to do it
> > I use Firefox not with Debian,
> > but other distros.
>
> I didn't notice that..I see Arch Linux listed among the multitudes:
>
> http://futurist.se/gldt/wp-content/uploads/12.10/gldt1210.svg
>
> You can't have too many Linux distros apparently. What's to like
> about Arch Linux?
> --
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 02:44 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> When you boot your new system you don't (at least I don't) and you
> have to tweak it yourself. Easy enough to do but it's likely different
> than what you have and you will need to read up on how to get it
> going. Hard to do if you don't hav
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:27:41 -0400
Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:20:04 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > I use Firefox not with Debian,
> > but other distros.
>
> I didn't notice that..I see Arch Linux listed among the multitudes:
>
> http://futurist.se/gldt/wp-content/uplo
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 22:27 -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:20:04 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > I use Firefox not with Debian,
> > but other distros.
>
> I didn't notice that..I see Arch Linux listed among the multitudes:
>
> http://futurist.se/gldt/wp-content/uploa
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:20:04 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I use Firefox not with Debian,
> but other distros.
I didn't notice that..I see Arch Linux listed among the multitudes:
http://futurist.se/gldt/wp-content/uploads/12.10/gldt1210.svg
You can't have too many Linux distros apparently. Wha
On 04/04/2013 21:55, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:20:02 +0200
Andreas Glaeser wrote:
it seems to be necessary to remove
iceweasel first, prior to using Firefox.
# apt-get remove iceweasel
[...cut...]
Now I have firefox ESR 17.0.5 OR iceweasel 10.0.12 one can take one's
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 19:48 -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:00:02 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > And I really use Firefox, I
> > don't confuse it with the Google thingy.
>
> I would be happy enough to use Firefox the ESR version improved HTML 5 is
> welcome
> here, it'
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:00:02 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> And I really use Firefox, I
> don't confuse it with the Google thingy.
I would be happy enough to use Firefox the ESR version improved HTML 5 is
welcome
here, it's time for flash to go away. I have now alongside Iceweasel. I wonder
why
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:55 -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> What am I looking for here, better HTML 5 (?) Will that do away with all those
> video-not-available messages I see on youtube, or make things worse?
For my current Arch Linux install I decided not to install flashplayer
or even gnash any
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:20:02 +0200
Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> it seems to be necessary to remove
> iceweasel first, prior to using Firefox.
> # apt-get remove iceweasel
I'm running sid on a x86_64 setup and I didn't find your instructions to remove
iceweasel worked like you suggested:
# apt-get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 13.10.2012 10:48, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> I need this package to Debian Squeeze.
>
> Where could I found?
According to [packages.debian.org] that package is replaced by
gecko-mediaplayer.
You can get it with "sudo aptitude install gecko-me
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:49:07 +0200, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> Everyone who wants or needs improved HTML5-support can download Mozilla
> Firefox webbrowser here:
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html You get improved
> rendering-speed, the optional 'do not track' feature and more for free.
14.04.2012 07:49, Andreas Glaeser kirjoitti:
> Everyone who wants or needs improved HTML5-support can download Mozilla
> Firefox
> webbrowser here:
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
> You get improved rendering-speed, the optional 'do not track' feature and
> more for
> free.
> Inst
On Ma, 14 dec 10, 09:37:29, Lisi wrote:
> > >
> > > I was under the (mis?)apprehension that things were only installed from
> > > backports if I specifically asked for them, i.e. "-t lenny-backports" was
> > > added to aptitude, and were only updated if already installed.
> >
> > 'apt-cache policy
On Monday 13 December 2010 20:40:19 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 13 dec 10, 19:57:50, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 December 2010 15:32:17 Camaleón wrote:
> > > On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +, Lisi wrote:
> > > > I have Lenny, and Iceweasel 3.5.15. Any updating has been done by
> > > > aptitu
On Monday 13 December 2010 20:11:19 Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:57:50 +, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 December 2010 15:32:17 Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +, Lisi wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 07 November 2010 23:24:17 Camaleón wrote:
> >> >> - What is the current
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 19:57:50, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 05 December 2010 15:32:17 Camaleón wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +, Lisi wrote:
> > >
> > > I have Lenny, and Iceweasel 3.5.15. Any updating has been done by
> > > aptitude.
> >
> > Then you should have "backports" repository enable
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:57:50 +, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 05 December 2010 15:32:17 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +, Lisi wrote:
>> > On Sunday 07 November 2010 23:24:17 Camaleón wrote:
>> >> - What is the current status of Iceweasel in Lenny? - Are all the
>> >> recent bug
On Sunday 05 December 2010 15:32:17 Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 November 2010 23:24:17 Camaleón wrote:
> >> - What is the current status of Iceweasel in Lenny? - Are all the
> >> recent bugs of Firefox -that can affect 3.0 branch- fixed/ backpo
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 07 November 2010 23:24:17 Camaleón wrote:
>> - What is the current status of Iceweasel in Lenny? - Are all the
>> recent bugs of Firefox -that can affect 3.0 branch- fixed/ backported
>> to Iceweasel 3.0.6?
>> - Does 3.0.6 versioning numb
On Sunday 07 November 2010 23:24:17 Camaleón wrote:
> - What is the current status of Iceweasel in Lenny?
> - Are all the recent bugs of Firefox -that can affect 3.0 branch- fixed/
> backported to Iceweasel 3.0.6?
> - Does 3.0.6 versioning number follow the upstream numbering?
I have Lenny, and Ic
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:15:10 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Sunday 07 November 2010 13:21:06 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:40:09 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> > On Vi, 05 nov 10, 19:47:58, Rob Owens wrote:
>> >> What I would like (and think they should have done in the cas
On Sunday 07 November 2010 13:21:06 Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:40:09 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Vi, 05 nov 10, 19:47:58, Rob Owens wrote:
> >> What I would like (and think they should have done in the case of
> >> Iceweasel) is issue a security update that is simply a message
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:40:09 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 05 nov 10, 19:47:58, Rob Owens wrote:
>> >
>> What I would like (and think they should have done in the case of
>> Iceweasel) is issue a security update that is simply a message to the
>> admin that stable's version of Iceweasel i
On Vi, 05 nov 10, 19:47:58, Rob Owens wrote:
> >
> What I would like (and think they should have done in the case of
> Iceweasel) is issue a security update that is simply a message to the
> admin that stable's version of Iceweasel is now unsupported. The
> security update should not automaticall
On 2010-11-06 12:42 +0100, Rob Owens wrote:
> Is there a procedure in place for dropping a package from stable?
Yes, this actually happens from time to time.
> Do the rules allow it?
Yes, but currently only at point releases.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:05:44AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> The ideal is that improvement of all Debian programs is done in collaboration
> with upstream. That not always the case, then DDs have to fill that role or
> drop the package. (Disregarding all the packages where Debian o
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:11:51 -0400, Doug wrote:
>> On 2010-11-05 15:38 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>>
> /snip/
>>
>>> I see only one reason to force the upgrade of a stock package with a
>>> newer version and is precisely the lack of support (nor patches) from
>>> upstream packager.
>>
> /snip/
You ar
Dne, 05. 11. 2010 23:30:19 je Kamaraju S Kusumanchi napisal(a):
Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 05. 11. 2010 15:10:44 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
>
>> No. That's NOT what those who know and love Debian stable want.
The
>> lack of
>> upstream changes is one of the main reasons I use stable
In , Camaleón wrote:
>I prefer having no extensions at all than browsing the web with an
>unsupported browser :-).
Iceweasel 3.0.x isn't unsupported; Firefox 3.0.x is.[1] Security groups don't
stop disclosing vulnerabilities when Mozilla decides to stop supplying patches
and the security team (
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:07:13PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:48:04 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > On 2010-11-05 17:48 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> >> Do you think Debian packages include all these bug fixes?
> >>
> >> http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/f
On 11/5/2010 12:00 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-11-05 15:38 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:10:44 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
/snip/
I see only one reason to force the upgrade of a stock package with a
newer version and is precisely the lack of support (nor patches
Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 05. 11. 2010 15:10:44 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
>
>> No. That's NOT what those who know and love Debian stable want. The
>> lack of
>> upstream changes is one of the main reasons I use stable on servers.
>
> +1
> You can say that again.
>
+2
Seriously! I d
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:48:04 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-11-05 17:48 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Do you think Debian packages include all these bug fixes?
>>
>> http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html
>
> No, MFSA 2009-11 is not fixed (that is a Firefox-only
On 2010-11-05 17:48 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:00:13 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> That is true, but the Debian iceweasel/xulrunner maintainer and the
>> security team backport security fixes.
>
> How is that possible? :-?
>
> As soon as Mozilla stopped offering security
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:00:13 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-11-05 15:38 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> What happens with Mozilla packages (more exactly with
>> Firefox/Iceweasel) is that upstream version correct security flaws,
>> meaning that right now, Debian's lenny stock version of Iceweas
On 2010-11-05 15:38 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:10:44 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
>> On Friday 05 November 2010 08:13:41 Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> > Thirdly, the policy of no new upstream versions after release isn't
>>> > changed for volatile. (It is changed for volati
Dne, 05. 11. 2010 15:10:44 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
No. That's NOT what those who know and love Debian stable want. The
lack of
upstream changes is one of the main reasons I use stable on servers.
+1
You can say that again.
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:10:44 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010 08:13:41 Camaleón wrote:
>> > Thirdly, the policy of no new upstream versions after release isn't
>> > changed for volatile. (It is changed for volatile-sloppy.)
>>
>> And that is what people wants to
On Friday 05 November 2010 08:13:41 Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:54:29 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > In , Camaleón wrote:
> >>On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >>> There is a third choice, I guess: Ship firefox / thunderbird in
> >>> non-free
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:54:29 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Camaleón wrote:
>>On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> There is a third choice, I guess: Ship firefox / thunderbird in
>>> non-free. Support for non-free is best-effort, which basically means
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> There is a third choice, I guess: Ship firefox / thunderbird in
>> non-free. Support for non-free is best-effort, which basically means
>> that if upstream is willing to fix it then the security team /
>> mai
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:04:46 +, Chris wrote:
>> How about "volatile"? :-?
>>
>> ClamAV packages are there for that precisely reason (they need to be
>> updated -security fixes- very often).
>>
> Why not simply grab the package from mozilla and install under /opt Sent
It lacks system integrat
Why not simply grab the package from mozilla and install under /opt
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Camaleón
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:38:21
To:
Subject: Mozilla products in Debian (was: A question for the list:)
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:30:11 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith J
Le 14/07/2010 10:31, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:22 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Le 14/07/2010 05:04, T o n g wrote:
Hi,
How can I install the MPlayer Plugin for Mozilla?
$ apt-cache search mozilla mplayer
mozilla-mplayer - MPlayer-Plugin for Mozilla
Since
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:22 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Le 14/07/2010 05:04, T o n g wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How can I install the MPlayer Plugin for Mozilla?
> >
> > $ apt-cache search mozilla mplayer
> > mozilla-mplayer - MPlayer-Plugin for Mozilla
> >
> > Since the 'mozilla-mplayer'
Le 14/07/2010 05:04, T o n g wrote:
Hi,
How can I install the MPlayer Plugin for Mozilla?
$ apt-cache search mozilla mplayer
mozilla-mplayer - MPlayer-Plugin for Mozilla
Since the 'mozilla-mplayer' is already obsolete, and there is no other
package I found doing this. I don't know what to do.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:13:32 -0500
Chris wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm unsure if this was a topic - Could someone explain or point me to
> a resource that enlightens me why the Mozilla re-branding.
>
> For now, I have opted not to use IceW and IceOwl in lieu of the actual
> Linux binaries that ar
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:57:42 +0900, Bret Busby wrote:
> Well, after having been advised on the list, to upgrade to Debian 5,
> from Debian 4, I have done it, on my laptop, to trial Debian 5.
>
>
As Lisi pointed out, I too didn't find an overwhelming number of
suggestions to do as you have chose
On Sunday 08 March 2009 13:39:16 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Perhaps part of your difficulty here is that you do read carefully the
> advice you are given.^^
do NOT read carefully
Ouch!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Saturday 07 March 2009 23:57:42 Bret Busby wrote:
> Well, after having been advised on the list, to upgrade to Debian 5,
> from Debian 4
Having no memory of anyone's having advised you to upgrade to Lenny, I have
just reread the entire lengthy previous thread. I could not find a single
perso
Bret Busby wrote:
> The Mozilla suite, whether you want to name it seamonkey or iceape, or
whatever, has apparently been removed from Debian, the last version
where it as present, being Debian 4.
It is kind of like driving a car without a windscreen; it runs, but it
is not nice.
Install Ic
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 15:57, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> Well, after having been advised on the list, to upgrade to Debian 5, from
> Debian 4, I have done it, on my laptop, to trial Debian 5.
>
> It appears that it is against my better judgement.
>
> The Mozilla suite, whether you want to name it seamo
Bret writes:
> The Mozilla suite, whether you want to name it seamonkey or iceape, or
> whatever, has apparently been removed from Debian, the last version where
> it as present, being Debian 4.
That's no reason for you to remove it from your machine.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:17:16 -0500, Wu-Kung Sun wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Vasil Benov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My system is Debian Etch, Nvidia GeForce4 MX 440 (if this is of any
>> relevance), I use the Gnome desktop environment.
>>
>> I think this might be a bug either in the mozil
On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:47:51 -0500
"Dave Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
> > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Anybody got a hin
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:47:51 -0500
"Dave Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
> > Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does
> >
On 4/4/07, Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does not
> > involve -- wait for Etch, etc...I know someone wants to say
> > that!) ???
>
> I do not kn
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:28:32 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does not
> > involve -- wait for Etch, etc...I know someone wants to say
> > that!) ???
>
> I do not know the solution for Sarge. I am using Etch an
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:03:41 -0500
"Dave Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it is Sarge, but do you mean I won't be able to use Flash
> unless I upgrade to Etch? Maybe the world has moved on from Sarge
> and Flash 7??
I haven't been watching this thread, but I use Sarge w/Firefox a
Flash.
-
Yes it is Sarge, but do you mean I won't be able to use Flash unless I
upgrade to Etch? Maybe the world has moved on from Sarge and Flash 7??
On 4/4/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:23 -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> 7.0.25
Your version number, herein lies your p
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:23 -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> 7.0.25
Your version number, herein lies your problem. I am assuming you are
using Sarge, correct?
If so, there are some methods to fix this, but your best bet is to
upgrade to Etch in a few days, after it is released.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTEC
On 4/3/07, Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:16:40 -0400
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> > Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:16:40 -0400
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> > Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
> >
> > I am curious whether it is po
Dave Walker wrote:
Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
I am curious whether it is possible to get some version of Flash to work?
---
Here is what I did t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22 -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
>
> I am curious whether it is possible to get some version of Flash to work?
> -
Dave Walker wrote:
> Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
>
[message snipped]
>
> Anybody got a hint or even better, a solution (one that does not
> involve -- wait for Etch, etc...I know someone wants to say that!) ???
I do not know the solution for Sarge. I am using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0500, Dave Walker wrote:
> Running Mozilla/5.0 1.7.8-1sarge10(current stable release).
>
> I am curious whether it is possible to get some version of Flash to work?
> Here is what I did to this point:
>
> apt-
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 01:28:04AM -0400, Larry Moore wrote:
> Both epiphany-browser and mozilla-browser fail at startup with:
> ** ERROR **: file corba-orb.c: line 360 (CORBA_ORB_init): assertion
> failed: (ORBIT_ALIGNOF_CORBA_DOUBLE > 2)
>
> I'm running Sarge on a M68k Mac with low
Both epiphany-browser and mozilla-browser fail at startup with:
** ERROR **: file corba-orb.c: line 360 (CORBA_ORB_init): assertion
failed: (ORBIT_ALIGNOF_CORBA_DOUBLE > 2)
I'm running Sarge on a M68k Mac with low RAM (24meg) but 750 meg of
swap.
Is there a way to get either pro
On 3/17/07, Vasil Benov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
My system is Debian Etch, Nvidia GeForce4 MX 440 (if this is of any
relevance), I use the Gnome desktop environment.
I think this might be a bug either in the mozilla-vlc plugin or (not very
likely) in the iceweasel.
If there is no any
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:43:01 -0600
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Tom Grove wrote:
> >> Is there a Sunbird port to Debian?
> >>
> >> -Tom
> >>
> >>
> >
> > and with the wonders of google ;-)
> > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/mail/sunbird
> >
>
1 - 100 of 1382 matches
Mail list logo
