Re: Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:15, Felix C. Stegerman wrote: > * Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-15 00:49]: > > try "apt-get moo" > > then "aptitude moo" > > then "aptitude moo -v" > > then "aptitude moo -vv" > > and so on > > Now that was funny! So it isn't super cow powers, but at least

Re: Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Felix C. Stegerman
* Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-15 00:49]: > try "apt-get moo" > then "aptitude moo" > then "aptitude moo -v" > then "aptitude moo -vv" > and so on Now that was funny! - Felix -- Felix C. Stegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://obfusk.net ~ "Any sufficiently advanced

Re: Moo! (WAS Re: upgrade only if installed)

2006-06-14 Thread Kelly Clowers
On 6/14/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wow...here's a silly one for the archives. On Wednesday 14 June 2006 13:46, Bill Thompson wrote: > In addition, the command "aptitude" is now recommended in place of > "apt-get". The aptitude program handles package dependencies better > th

Re: moo

2003-01-29 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:05:49AM -0600, will trillich wrote: > $ apt-get moo >(__) >(oo) > /--\/ > / ||| >* /\---/\ > ~~ ~~ > "Have you mooed today?"... > > can't say that i have. Nor have I.

Re: moo

2003-01-28 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:05:49AM -0600, will trillich wrote: | $ apt-get moo |(__) |(oo) | /--\/ | / ||| |* /\---/\ | ~~ ~~ | "Have you mooed today?"... | | can't say that i have. | | this is