On Jul 2, 9:20 pm, Paul Scott wrote:
[. . .]
> I believe that if my monitor info were being read correctly I would have
> no problem with monitor resolution. Is is possible that I just need to
> file a bug against read-edid?
I recently had a conversation with a maintainer of xserver-xorg-video-
On 07/03/2011 04:27 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 16:06:24 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
I don't think he did. :)
Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
1024x7
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 16:06:24 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
I don't think he did. :)
>> Paul Scott wrote:
>>> On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> 1024x768 60.0*
>
On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
1024x768 60.0*
800x60060.3 56.2
848x48060.0
640x48059.9
My LCD monitor's native re
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 00:17:16 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> I believe that if my monitor info were being read correctly I would have
> no problem with monitor resolution. Is is possible that I just need to
> file a bug against read-edid?
More likely the bug would be in the kernel but I'm no ex
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:39:50 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/02/2011 12:23 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>> On 07/02/2011 02:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> Also, better if you upload your full "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" somewhere,
>>
>> I will do that soon but I believe it will show you that read-edid is
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:23:34 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/02/2011 02:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:22:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running sid.
>>>
>>> My monitor stopped going to the correct resolution some upgrades ago.
>>> I have an
>>>
>>> nVidia Corporation N
On Sat 02 Jul 2011 at 10:44:51 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> I wasn't sure whether you were giving me an example or the exact line I
> needed. The above gives:
>
> X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist)
> Major opcode of failed request: 150 (RANDR)
> Minor op
On 07/01/2011 01:22 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Hi,
I'm running sid.
My monitor stopped going to the correct resolution some upgrades ago.
I have an
nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX - nForce GPU] (rev a3).
I'm researching many things from this list etc. to attempt to solve
the problem but o
On 07/02/2011 12:23 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/02/2011 02:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:22:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
I'm running sid.
My monitor stopped going to the correct resolution some upgrades
ago. I
have an
nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX - nForce GPU] (rev
On 07/02/2011 11:58 AM, Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jul 2011 at 11:01:52 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/02/2011 07:40 AM, Brian wrote:
There is a direct connection between the monitor and the video
adapter?
AFAIK
It would be visually obvious.
But the card doesn't do 1280x1024 or 1024x768.
Why
On 07/02/2011 02:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:22:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
I'm running sid.
My monitor stopped going to the correct resolution some upgrades ago. I
have an
nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX - nForce GPU] (rev a3).
Which VGA driver are you using?
Whate
On Sat 02 Jul 2011 at 11:01:52 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/02/2011 07:40 AM, Brian wrote:
>>
>> There is a direct connection between the monitor and the video
>> adapter?
>
> AFAIK
It would be visually obvious.
>> But the card doesn't do 1280x1024 or 1024x768.
>
> Why do you say that? From
On 07/02/2011 07:40 AM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 20:47:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
xrandr believes VGA-1 is only capable of 1024x768. Why do you believe
1280x1024 is possible?
1. The monitor keeps telling me it works better at 1280x1024.
Mine
On 07/02/2011 04:04 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
1024x768 60.0*
800x60060.3 56.2
848x48060.0
640x48059.9
My LCD monitor's native re
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 20:47:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
>>
>> xrandr believes VGA-1 is only capable of 1024x768. Why do you believe
>> 1280x1024 is possible?
>
> 1. The monitor keeps telling me it works better at 1280x1024.
Mine has a button to press which
Paul Scott wrote:
>On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
>> On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>>> 1024x768 60.0*
>>> 800x60060.3 56.2
>>> 848x48060.0
>>> 640x48059.9
>>> My LCD monitor's native resolution is 1280x1024
>> xrandr
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:22:02 -0700
Paul Scott wrote:
Hello Paul,
> nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX - nForce GPU] (rev a3).
>
> I'm researching many things from this list etc. to attempt to solve
> the problem but one concern is that I don't think my monitor is being
> detected correctly.
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:22:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> I'm running sid.
>
> My monitor stopped going to the correct resolution some upgrades ago. I
> have an
>
> nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX - nForce GPU] (rev a3).
Which VGA driver are you using?
Nvidia closed driver provides "nvidia
On 07/01/2011 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
VGA-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
0mm x 0mm
1024x768 60.0*
800x60060.3 56.2
848x48060.0
640x48059.9
My LCD monitor
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 15:19:21 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> VGA-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 0mm x 0mm
>1024x768 60.0*
>800x60060.3 56.2
>848x48060.0
>640x48059.9
> My LCD monitor's native resolution is 128
Paul Scott writes:
> On 07/01/2011 02:25 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>> Paul Scott wrote:
>> xrandr
>>
>> output? Is your monitor correctly listed? What happens when you try
>
> (after stopping gdm3) I get "can't open display"
You need to run xrandr in an X session. Have you tried to run
nvidia
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 14:38:00 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 02:25 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>
>> xrandr
>>
>> output? Is your monitor correctly listed? What happens when you try
>
> (after stopping gdm3) I get "can't open display"
xrandr has to be run from within X.
--
To UNSUBSC
On 07/01/2011 03:08 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
(after stopping gdm3) I get "can't open display"
Well, don’t stop gdm then and run these commands in a terminal (such
as gnome-terminal or konsole or whatever desktop environment you are
using). Also don’t use any sort of sudo or
On 07/01/2011 02:25 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Hi,
I'm running sid.
My monitor stopped going to the correct resolution some upgrades ago. I
have an
nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX - nForce GPU] (rev a3).
I'm researching many things from this list etc. to attempt to so
On 07/01/2011 01:50 PM, Brian wrote:
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 13:22:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
TIA for any comments on this part of my display problem.
People may welcome information on the video driver you are using.
I mentioned the card from lspci. I am trying as many of the various
nVidia
On Fri 01 Jul 2011 at 13:22:02 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> TIA for any comments on this part of my display problem.
People may welcome information on the video driver you are using.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
27 matches
Mail list logo
