On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 14:56, Frank A. Uepping wrote:
> does someone know a package for the new modutils for Woody?
Adrian Bunk has them, backports.org too
http://www.apt-get.org/search.php?query=module-init-tools&submit=&arch%5B%5D=i386&arch%5B%5D=all
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:01:09PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have noticed that when I load a module the /etc/modutils/
> files, which conatins the "post-install" lines, doesn't run.
> So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a /etc/modutils/emu10k1
> file, which contains this lin
David Z Maze írta:
LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have noticed that when I load a module the
/etc/modutils/ files, which conatins the "post-install"
lines, doesn't run.
So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a
/etc/modutils/emu10k1 file, which contains this line:
post-install emu10k
LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have noticed that when I load a module the
> /etc/modutils/ files, which conatins the "post-install"
> lines, doesn't run.
> So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a
> /etc/modutils/emu10k1 file, which contains this line:
> post-install emu10k1 /usr/l
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > Because, as of kernel 2.5.48 the kernel modules now end in .ko and have a
> > completely different internal structure. The new module-init-tools does
> not
> > handle old style modules, but recognizes and passes them on to modutils.
> > The old
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 00:26, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
> > work.
> > Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
> > module-init-tools also checks
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:59, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > > modultils -- kernel < 2.5.48
> > > module-init-tools -- kernel >= 2.5.48
> > >
> > > Of course, module if module-init-tools finds an earlier kernel, it passes
> > the
> > > work on to the o
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:59, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > > modultils -- kernel < 2.5.48
> > > module-init-tools -- kernel >= 2.5.48
> > >
> > > Of course, module if module-init-tools finds an earlier kernel, it passes
> > the
> > > work on to the o
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > modultils -- kernel < 2.5.48
> > module-init-tools -- kernel >= 2.5.48
> >
> > Of course, module if module-init-tools finds an earlier kernel, it passes
> the
> > work on to the old version.
> >
>
> They are still almost the same, except for t
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
> work.
> Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
> module-init-tools also checks for /proc/modules.
> Then both run depmod, modutils does a bit
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
> >depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
> >'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
> >ieee1394_device_size
>
> Known bug. The modutils package maintainer reduced the severity from
> grave to importa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
>the following message:
>
>Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
>depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
>'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
>ieee1394_
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
> My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
> the following message:
>
> Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
> depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
> '/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
> ieee139
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:37:13AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
| > My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
| > the following message:
| >
| > Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
| > depmod: Unexpected value (2
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
> My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
> the following message:
>
> Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
> depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
> '/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
> ieee139
On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:29:05 +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> ** Hi,
> **
> ** If I did "depmod -a" then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
> ** in size.
> **
> ** Pretty interesting... if modules.dep's size is 0, then no module could
> ** be loaded.
> ** What could be the cause?
> ** I
Robert Waldner wrote:
> There´s a FAQ on www.debian.org about that, see
> http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
OK, I've upgraded all the necessary packages; now depmod works fine.
Thanks a lot.
BTW, I see some conflicting programs; those on net-tools and netbase.
debsums net-tools would retu
Matthew Dalton wrote:
>
> Oki DZ wrote:
> > It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
> > having unstable libs on a stable machine?
>
> Why not compile your own modutils package from the sources in unstable?
> You don't need to upgrade glibc then.
Instructions for
Robert Waldner wrote:
> There´s a FAQ on www.debian.org about that, see
> http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
I see, it's already on the homepage...
Well, I think it's time to have a new feature on apt-get; it has to
print something like:
"Hi, wanna hear some news before continuing?" [Y/n]
a
Oki DZ wrote:
> It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
> having unstable libs on a stable machine?
Why not compile your own modutils package from the sources in unstable?
You don't need to upgrade glibc then.
> Well, actually, my question
> is: what unstable pac
On Wed, 23 May 2001 12:33:12 +0700, Oki DZ writes:
>It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
>having unstable libs on a stable machine? Well, actually, my question
>is: what unstable packages do you have to install on a stable machine in
>order to have the machine h
Thomas Weinbrenner wrote:
> ,[ /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes ]
> | Current Minimal Requirements
> |
> |
> | Upgrade to at *least* these software revisions before thinking you've
> | encountered a bug! If you're unsure what version you're currently
> | runnin
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Oki DZ said:
> "Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
>> What version of modutils are you using?
>
> ii modutils 2.3.11-13.1Linux module utilities.
,[ /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes ]
| Current Minimal Requirements
|
|
| Upgrade to at *l
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
> What version of modutils are you using?
ii modutils 2.3.11-13.1Linux module utilities.
Running on stable Debian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux bdg 2.4.4 #6 Fri May 4 11:53:01 JAVT 2001 i686 unknown
Oki
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:29:05AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> If I did "depmod -a" then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
> in size.
What version of modutils are you using?
noah
--
___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:29:05AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I did "depmod -a" then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
> in size.
>
> Pretty interesting... if modules.dep's size is 0, then no module could
> be loaded.
> What could be the cause?
> I have reinstalled modutils two
On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
: I have been getting streams of messages as follows:
:
: Sep 26 18:40:01 mwariker modprobe: can't locate module char-major-14
: Sep 26 18:40:12 mwariker last message repeated 38 times
Add the following line to /etc/conf.modules or the newer
I was worried yesterday that I would not be able to boot the box, but the
upgrade went quite well. Thanks, Debian.
On that box dselect shows:
-**modules
***modutils
and does not have a modules.prerm.
My box at home shows
***modules
***modutils
and modules.prerm has no ch
> I'm trying to upgrade modules to modutils but dpkg says:
> Kernel was compiled with module support
> Modules package cannot be removed
>
> Ideas? I'm in the field at the moment.
What I did was to edit the modules.prerm file in /var/lib/dpkg/info and
delete the check described above. Then the
Syrus,
Many thanks - you got me out of a bit of a hole, there.
dpkg now says that modutils is installed, but I notice that
/dev/init.d/boot still refers to modutils. Hope this is OK.
Lindsay
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Lindsay Allen wrote:
>
> >
On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade modules to modutils but dpkg says:
> Kernel was compiled with module support
> Modules package cannot be removed
>
> Ideas? I'm in the field at the moment.
Yes. This one can be solved by hand with dpkg. You need to ftp the
mod
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > A warning to everyone trying to run new kernels: the current modutils
> > implementation does not work with the latest kernel recent. For the
> > stable kernels everything up to and including 2.0.29 seems to work
>
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> A warning to everyone trying to run new kernels: the current modutils
> implementation does not work with the latest kernel recent. For the
> stable kernels everything up to and including 2.0.29 seems to work
> fine. 2.0.30 however does not work. For the 2.1 series there
33 matches
Mail list logo
