On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:03:48AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> Sean Richardson said:
> > In the past I have typically just built these packages (again for many
> > reasons)...but seeing as they are already available under woody I would
> > like to try the packages. I am not quite ready to switch
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 04:49:23PM -0500, Sean Richardson wrote:
>
> I guess my question was is there a way to tell apt-get to use woody for
> some packages and potato for others...without manually switching my
> sources.list every time between potato and woody.
>
I use a little script called un
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:03:48AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> At this point, potato and woody are very similar, so it might not be as big
> of a download as you fear. You could try pointing your sources.list at
before I wrote my message I did try a dist-upgrade...and it was going to
be around
Sean Richardson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This may be an absurd/silly question...but I have been unable to find an
> answer elsewhere...so bare with me...
Hey - Debian's going nudist?
;)
LeeE
--
http://www.spatial.freeserve.co.uk
...or something
Sean Richardson said:
> In the past I have typically just built these packages (again for many
> reasons)...but seeing as they are already available under woody I would
> like to try the packages. I am not quite ready to switch over to
> woody as I am stuck behind a modem for another month and wait
5 matches
Mail list logo
