OK, I have to jump in since there seems to be a lot of misinformation
going around.
Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is one snag. Aptitude keeps a note of packages that have been
> installed manually (as opposed to being installed automatically as
> dependencies). The result is that
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:39, Chris Lale wrote this for perusal by us all:
>---> Black Dew wrote:
>--->
>---> > kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>---> >
>---> >> Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to
>---> >> mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes
Black Dew wrote:
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to
mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
Both synap
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix
apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
Both synaptic and aptitude are
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix
apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
Both synaptic and aptitude are
5 matches
Mail list logo
