Re: missing LDD in Linux

1999-10-03 Thread Gregory T. Norris
I'd probably just snarf the package off the Debian website. Go to , and you should be given the option of downloading the debfile. Once completed, do ``dpkg -i ldso*.deb'' (as root). Note: I'm assuming that you're running the stable branch (2

Re: missing LDD in Linux

1999-10-03 Thread Puam
Gregory T. Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /usr/bin/ldd is one of the dynamic-linker utilities, and is provided by > the ldso package. It definately ought to be present... I'd suggesr > reinstalling ldso. hmm... ok i am a newbie, how do i do that? or can i ju

Re: missing LDD in Linux

1999-10-02 Thread Gregory T. Norris
/usr/bin/ldd is one of the dynamic-linker utilities, and is provided by the ldso package. It definately ought to be present... I'd suggesr reinstalling ldso. On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:18:59PM +0200, Bruno Van de Casteele wrote: > hi, > > while compiling my kernel (and pine, but that's smth else

Re: missing ldd - SOLVED

1999-05-27 Thread Ingo Hohmann
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:49:23PM +0200, Ingo Hohmann wrote: <...> > As ldd seems not to be installed, which package provides it? <...> OK, I found it now, it was in the ldso package, I reinstalled it, et voila! I still have no clue, why it hasn't been installed the first time around. thanks to

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-26 Thread Ingo Hohmann
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 01:14:47AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Subject: Re: missing ldd > Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:07:37AM -0500 > > In reply to:Brad > > Quoting Brad([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > > >

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-26 Thread Pollywog
On 26-May-99 Brad wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > >> So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not? >> libc6 doesn't provide ldd, ldso does. > > In potato, libc6 does. Apparently ldso does in slink. Yes, that is what I recall. On my system, 'dpkg -S ldd' says th

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-26 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: missing ldd Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:07:37AM -0500 In reply to:Brad Quoting Brad([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not? > > libc6 doesn't pro

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-26 Thread Brad
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not? > libc6 doesn't provide ldd, ldso does. In potato, libc6 does. Apparently ldso does in slink.

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-26 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: missing ldd Date: Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:24:39PM +0200 In reply to:Ingo Hohmann Quoting Ingo Hohmann([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > in reply to both messages ... > > On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > <...> > > > As ld

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-25 Thread Ingo Hohmann
in reply to both messages ... On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: <...> > > As ldd seems not to be installed, which package provides it? > > > > Try dpgg -S ldd I've tried it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ingo > dpkg -S ldd ldso: /usr/man/man1/ldd.1.gz tetex-base: /usr/lib/texmf

Re: missing ldd

1999-05-25 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: missing ldd Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:49:23PM +0200 In reply to:Ingo Hohmann Quoting Ingo Hohmann([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > When I run > > debian/rules binary > > in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot exec ldd: No such

RE: missing ldd

1999-05-25 Thread Pollywog
On 24-May-99 Ingo Hohmann wrote: > When I run > > debian/rules binary > > in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot exec ldd: No such file or directory > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/games/grobots' gave error > exit status 2 > dh_s

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

1999-03-15 Thread Mike Merten
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. > > so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

1999-03-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. > > so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

1999-03-15 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. > > so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc 2.1? will i still be > left with a (mostly) usable system? > > (i

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

1999-03-15 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc 2.1? will i still be left with a (mostly) usable system? (i'm willing t