On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 04:36:41 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> The semi-equivalent system under Unix would be [n]curses. There's
> probably little chance of getting that program to run under Linux without
> some serious rewriting on your part.
Well, there is a reasonable chance it will compile
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Oliver Hingst wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to compile a C++ program, which will be at some point a
> Reverse Polish Notation program. I am trying to use a function called
> getche() . Therefore, from what I have read, I need to
>
> #include
>
> The problem is on my Potat
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 12:09:18PM +0100, Oliver Hingst wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to compile a C++ program, which will be at some point a
> Reverse Polish Notation program. I am trying to use a function called
> getche() . Therefore, from what I have read, I need to
>
> #include
That's a D
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Mike Touloumtzis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 10:57:21PM -0700, Robert Kerr wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to port a program from HP-UX to Linux, but I seem to be missing
> > a header file. This seems kind of strange to me, since the header file is
> > present in the g
On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 10:57:21PM -0700, Robert Kerr wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to port a program from HP-UX to Linux, but I seem to be missing
> a header file. This seems kind of strange to me, since the header file is
> present in the gcc directories on the HP's, but nowhere is it to be found
5 matches
Mail list logo
