I installed the bigmem kernel ( 2.6.24-1-686 ). Thought this is the same
kernel version that my system has been running on, when I try to boot to the
bigmem kernel, the boot process creeps along at an incredibly slow rate and
appears to hang during dev assignment / configuration, though it seems t
Hi,
ChadDavis schrieb:
I have 8gb of memory, bios sees it. Lenny only sees 3.2 gb.
Is there a different version of the kernel or parameter to make it see
all of my memory?
If you compile your kernel by hand, look at menuconfig for
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G
--
Viele Grüße
Dominique H. Schramm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/08 15:34, ChadDavis wrote:
> I have 8gb of memory, bios sees it. Lenny only sees 3.2 gb.
>
> Is there a different version of the kernel or parameter to make it see
> all of my memory?
Yes.
$ apt-cache search bigmem | grep ^linux | sort
-
dman posts :
> | even more interesting...
> | the 2.2.20 kernel reports:
> | total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
> | Mem: 994078720 42676224 951402496 10178560 8065024 21536768
> | MemTotal:970780 kB
>
> use 'free -m' to see smaller (easier to read) numbers.
>
The c
--begin quoted message from dman,
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:54:04PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
> | --begin quoted message from dman,
>
> | > On my system I have 256MB real RAM.
> | >
> | > It shows a total of only 249MB. dmesg shows :
> | >
> | > $ dmesg | grep Memory
> | > Memory: 255676k
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:54:04PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
| --begin quoted message from dman,
| > On my system I have 256MB real RAM.
| >
| > It shows a total of only 249MB. dmesg shows :
| >
| > $ dmesg | grep Memory
| > Memory: 255676k/262080k available (k kernel code, 6016k reserved
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:54:04PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
> 2.4.16-k7 shows:
> Memory: 897676k/917504k available (815k kernel code, 19440k reserved, 233k
> data, 212k init, 0k highmem)
>
> 2.2.20 shows:
> Memory: 970628k/983040k available (1756k kernel code, 412k reserved, 10092k
> data, 152k
--begin quoted message from dman,
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:31:10PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
>
> use 'free -m' to see smaller (easier to read) numbers.
>
> Check dmesg -- some memory is used for the kernel itself and isn't
> available for processes to use.
thanks. those are both much prett
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:31:10PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
| --begin quoted message from Adam Majer,
| > Did you try a different kernel?
|
| even more interesting...
| the 2.2.20 kernel reports:
|
| total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
| Mem: 994078720 42676224 9514024
--begin quoted message from Adam Majer,
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:43:27PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
> > ok, first the problem:
> > my computer has 1024 M of RAM installed.
> > /proc/meminfo reports:
> >
> > total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
> > Mem: 923058176 4606238
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 12:43:27PM -0500, Noah Massey wrote:
> ok, first the problem:
> my computer has 1024 M of RAM installed.
> /proc/meminfo reports:
>
> total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
> Mem: 923058176 460623872 4624343040 33697792 172601344
> Swap: 317490
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:59:52 -0400, "Jonathan D. Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The bios reports 3716k RAM with >1M memory checking enabled
>there's 4 30pin simms installed.
>
>Linux sees 1936k available (free and top).
>
>Anyone know what can be causing this?
The memory reported does not
12 matches
Mail list logo
