also sprach Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.15.2020 +0100]:
> Are mdadm's UUIDs not the same as udev's?
mdadm in lenny has udev rules to create links under /dev/disks, if
that's what you mean. But the kernel does not (yet) generate udev
events when md arrays are added or remove
On Saturday 15 November 2008, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about
'mdadm device assembly
(was: udev causing data loss?)':
>also sprach ghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.15.1842 +0100]:
>> mdadm, I noticed yesterday, seems to be able to figure things out
>> and build its RAID arrays fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> mdadm does work which udev could/should be doing. I am not too much
> of a udev friend, and we must not depend on it
Right on, Bubba (I'm an old hippie from Texas :-)
> but prepare for
> mdadm and udev to cooperate much clos
3 matches
Mail list logo
