Re: maturedebs: sightly stable unstable

2008-02-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
Mike Bird: > > I can understand not updating Stable but the lack of migrations to Testing > means that we have to run bleeding edge Sid 2.6.24 kernels on nine-month > old production laptops (Thinkpad T61) which have been supported by the > kernel since 2.6.23 was released four months ago. (We had

Re: maturedebs: sightly stable unstable

2008-02-07 Thread Mike Bird
On Thu February 7 2008 01:14:40 Jochen Schulz wrote: > Yes. :) It's just that the rules for a package to move from unstable to > testing are quite tough. Which they should be, because every transition > to testing might be the last one for a package before the release. This is particularly a probl

Re: maturedebs: sightly stable unstable

2008-02-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
Paul Dwerryhouse: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of >> Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages >> we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable a

Re: maturedebs: sightly stable unstable

2008-02-06 Thread Paul Dwerryhouse
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of > Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages > we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable as > to be stale as stab