Mike Bird:
>
> I can understand not updating Stable but the lack of migrations to Testing
> means that we have to run bleeding edge Sid 2.6.24 kernels on nine-month
> old production laptops (Thinkpad T61) which have been supported by the
> kernel since 2.6.23 was released four months ago. (We had
On Thu February 7 2008 01:14:40 Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Yes. :) It's just that the rules for a package to move from unstable to
> testing are quite tough. Which they should be, because every transition
> to testing might be the last one for a package before the release.
This is particularly a probl
Paul Dwerryhouse:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of
>> Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages
>> we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable a
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:48:14PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gentlemen, why not let the others get cut on the cutting edge of
> Debian sid whilst we relax and wait oh, say 72 hours for the packages
> we want to stabilize? Slightly stable unstable, but not too stable as
> to be stale as stab
4 matches
Mail list logo