Re: make-kpkg funny

1999-02-24 Thread Bob Nielsen
I see that some has filed bug #33793 on this. Beat to the punch again! Bob On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:58:24 -0700 (MST), Bob Nielsen wrote: > > > > >I just compiled 2.2.2 using make-kpkg (kernel-package 6

Re: make-kpkg funny

1999-02-24 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:58:24 -0700 (MST), Bob Nielsen wrote: > > >I just compiled 2.2.2 using make-kpkg (kernel-package 6.07) and using the > >command 'make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image' it created a file > > > >kernel-image-.._custom.1.0_

Re: make-kpkg funny

1999-02-24 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: > Read the mail again. Instead of 2.2.2 for the kernel-version, he gets > `..'. This is no good. Sorry, I misunderstood him. I thought he used ".." as an ellipsis to indicate that he left something out.

Re: make-kpkg funny

1999-02-24 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
> On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:58:24 -0700 (MST), Bob Nielsen wrote: > > >I just compiled 2.2.2 using make-kpkg (kernel-package 6.07) and using the > >command 'make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image' it created a file > > > >kernel-image-.._custom.1.0_i386.deb > > > >Where does make-kpkg get the k

Re: make-kpkg funny

1999-02-24 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 20:58:24 -0700 (MST), Bob Nielsen wrote: >I just compiled 2.2.2 using make-kpkg (kernel-package 6.07) and using the >command 'make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image' it created a file > >kernel-image-.._custom.1.0_i386.deb > >Where does make-kpkg get the kernel version?