Re: make-kpkg error

2000-01-09 Thread Paul Biciunas
That was it. I had run make clean, not make-kpkg clean. Thanks. I'm now running a 2.2.14 kernel. -Paul > > > --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:12:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > On 7/1

Re: make-kpkg error

2000-01-08 Thread Brad
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:12:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On 7/1/2000 Paul Biciunas wrote: > > >I then ran the make-kpkg --rev eggplant.2 kernel-image > > > that is supposed to be an underscore, so it should be kernel_image. Actually, i

Re: make-kpkg error

2000-01-08 Thread Ethan Benson
On 7/1/2000 Paul Biciunas wrote: I then ran the make-kpkg --rev eggplant.2 kernel-image that is supposed to be an underscore, so it should be kernel_image. -- Ethan Benson ~~~

Re: make-kpkg error

1998-05-08 Thread Shaleh
Oliver Elphick wrote: > The last line does not terminate with \, so the `if' construct is not > terminated. All lines before the final `fi' need to end with \. Sure enough. I edited the rules file and all is well. Does a bug report need to be filed here or is the maintainer aware of this? --

Re: make-kpkg error

1998-05-08 Thread Oliver Elphick
Shaleh wrote: >Can someone point me to the problem here?? >if test -f debian/official -a -f debian/README.Debian ; then \ > install -p-o root -g root -m 644 debian/README.Debian \ >debian/tmp-source/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.34/README.Debian The last line does not ter

Re: make-kpkg error....

1997-09-24 Thread Waller Martin MEJ
>AUUgh! Bug! Bug, I say! this should be reported. > >Earlier in the build process, the architecture is set so: >architecture:=$(shell dpkg --print-architecture) > >What does dpkg --print-architecture show? The following: dpkg: unexpected output from `gcc --print-libgcc-file-name': `/

Re: make-kpkg error....

1997-09-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"David" == David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> On 23 Sep 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and >> arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the >> image did not build, for some reason. David> Perhaps you'

Re: make-kpkg error....

1997-09-23 Thread David Wright
On 23 Sep 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and > arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the > image did not build, for some reason. Perhaps you've overlooked the fact that, though the filename syntax might be l

Re: make-kpkg error....

1997-09-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Well, there is no difference between arch//boot/bzImage and arch/boot/bzImage, really, when it come to cp. I suspect that the image did not build, for some reason. a) what do you see when you do ls -als arch/boot/bzImage? b) What version of kernel-package are you using? c) Are th

Re: make-kpkg error

1997-03-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I am afraid that you have run into restrictions about the version numbering scheme imposed by Debian Policy. Your revision number is taken to have an upstream version (work) and a debian-revision, which is the rest of the revision field. The upstream version is not allowed to have