Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-28 Thread meridian
I used --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image with 2.2.11 and it worked fine. I applied an ac patch at a later time and when using make-kpkg with the same as above gave an "not in control info" error. But with 2.2.12 did not get this error as it did with someone else. Im using a frequently updated pota

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-28 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:22:02PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 12:22:23AM -0500, Brad wrote: > > | I've always used, for example, "--revision=2.2.12-hostname.1" because > > | dselect always

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Phillip Deackes
Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *- On 27 Aug, Phillip Deackes wrote about "Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12" > > > Oh, I didn't realise you needed make-kpkg clean - > > What effect would me not using it have? > > > > On a prestine source it

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:22:02PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 12:22:23AM -0500, Brad wrote: > | I've always used, for example, "--revision=2.2.12-hostname.1" because > | dselect always wanted to replace my custom kernels with the stock ones > | once that version went up

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:18:13PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 11:20:03AM +0800, Hans van den Boogert wrote: > | At 06:25 PM 8/26/99 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > | >make (menu)config > | >make-kpkg clean > | >make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image > | >dpkg -i .

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 27 Aug, Phillip Deackes wrote about "Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12" > Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The order should be >> >> apply patch >> make config >> make-kpkg clean >> make-kpkg --revision .. > >

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Phillip Deackes
Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The order should be > > apply patch > make config > make-kpkg clean > make-kpkg --revision .. Oh, I didn't realise you needed make-kpkg clean - I have never used this command, I have always gone from make xconfig to make-kpkg kernel-image . . . I

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Hwei Sheng TEOH
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Hans van den Boogert wrote: > At 06:25 PM 8/26/99 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > >make (menu)config > >make-kpkg clean > >make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image > >dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.12_custom.1.0_.deb > > > >These four steps work fine for me (though I'm stil

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 12:22:23AM -0500, Brad wrote: | I've always used, for example, "--revision=2.2.12-hostname.1" because | dselect always wanted to replace my custom kernels with the stock ones | once that version went up on the mirrors if i used just "custom.1"... | | Anyway, 2.2.12-* is the

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Hans van den Boogert wrote: > At 06:25 PM 8/26/99 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > >make (menu)config > >make-kpkg clean > >make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image I've always used, for example, "--revision=2.2.12-hostname.1" because ds

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 11:20:03AM +0800, Hans van den Boogert wrote: | At 06:25 PM 8/26/99 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: | >make (menu)config | >make-kpkg clean | >make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image | >dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.12_custom.1.0_.deb | > | >These four steps work fine for m

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Hans van den Boogert wrote: : At 06:25 PM 8/26/99 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: : >make (menu)config : >make-kpkg clean : >make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image : >dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.12_custom.1.0_.deb : > : >These four steps work fine for me (though I'm

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Hans van den Boogert
At 06:25 PM 8/26/99 -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: >make (menu)config >make-kpkg clean >make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image >dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.12_custom.1.0_.deb > >These four steps work fine for me (though I'm still using 2.2.10). Shouldn't there a make dep after make clean? --

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-27 Thread Eric G . Miller
make (menu)config make-kpkg clean make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.12_custom.1.0_.deb These four steps work fine for me (though I'm still using 2.2.10). -- ___ ___ __ _ _ __ |_ ) / -_) _` | ' \ / / \___\__, |_|_|_/___| |___/

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-26 Thread Richard E. Hawkins
> The order should be > > apply patch > make config > make-kpkg clean <= > make-kpkg --revision .. Ah-hah! thanks. After reading the manpage, I had thought that the distclean launched by clean would wipe out the config. Looking again, it seems that it saves .config somewher

Re: make-kpkg and 2.2.12

1999-08-26 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 26 Aug, Richard E. Hawkins wrote about "make-kpkg and 2.2.12" > > > I've always used raw kernels, as I can rarely get make-kpkg to produce > a kernel that does what I want. Is there something I need to do > besides apply the patch, make config and make dep, then run make-kpkg > again? >