also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.11.0457 +0200]:
> See? Each lndir directory only has files that were patched, or
> object files; and the ../linux-2.4.20 is pristine, ready to be
> patched up to 2.4.21.
I see this, yes. I used to do it exactly the same way, with
ha
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 09:31:28 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> i hope you don't mind me asking a question... also sprach Manoj
> Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.06.0223 +0200]:
>> % sudo echo 'debian := 5:501c' >> /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
> what does this line do?
I
i hope you don't mind me asking a question...
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.06.0223 +0200]:
> % sudo echo 'debian := 5:501c' >> /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
what does this line do?
the reason why i don't like your approach, although i really
appreciate you showing it to me, i
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:25:15 -0400, Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > So I am wondering: what am I doing wrong? I *should* be able to
>> > compile modules for an existing kernel tree without write privs
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.01.0006 +0200]:
> I still don't understand why that would solve the problem.
I am giving up. I thought it would be nice if make-kpkg could do
some magic to be able to compile modules from /usr/src/modules even
if /usr is read-only. Like some
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I am wondering: what am I doing wrong? I *should* be able to
> > compile modules for an existing kernel tree without write privs to
> > /usr/src/modules/..., right?
>
>
> Right.
>
> What is MODULE_
On Monday 30 June 2003 05:06 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.30.1548
+0200]:
> > When you do "fakeroot make-kpkg ..." make-kpkg itself runs under
> > fakeroot, so a root environment is provided whenever necessary,
> > instead of "as expected" by
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:17:58 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.30.2141 +0200]:
>> > cp: cannot create regular file
>> > `/usr/src/modules/nvidia/debian/control': Permission denied
>>
>> Right: with the default setup, the u
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:50:13 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I just configured, then made the kernel_image for a custom 2.4.21
> kernel with a couple of patches:
> make-kpkg --append-to-version
> -diamond-grsec-1.9.10+freeswan-ext-1.99+preempt-20030617-2
> --revision 200
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:17:58 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right: with the default setup, the user who runs make-kpkg needs write
> > access to /usr/src/modules, or you need to run under sudo.
>
> what??? this must be a joke? /usr can be mounted read-only!
That's not a jok
On 01 Jul 2003 09:57:19 +0200
JG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Setup:
> 1.- Add yourself to the "src" group (/usr/src/ belongs to root.src)
> 2.- Check that /usr/src/modules belongs to root.src, and has the sticky
> bit on:
>
> $ls -lsd /usr/src/modules/
>4 drwxrwsr-x2 root src
Package: kernel-package
Version: 8.040
Severity: normal
I am filing this as a bug.
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.30.2217 +0200]:
> > fakeroot make-kpkg --options
>
> How will that help. It is actually trying to create a file under
> /usr/src while being called as a non
also sprach Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.30.1548 +0200]:
> When you do "fakeroot make-kpkg ..." make-kpkg itself runs under
> fakeroot, so a root environment is provided whenever necessary,
> instead of "as expected" by make-kpkg's author.
I still don't understand why that would so
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:17:58 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How are other people doing it?
Umm, I'm doing it the way I suggested to you. :)
fakeroot make-kpkg ...
Works fine for me.
Kevin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
also sprach Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.29.2015 +0200]:
> Try a different syntax for make-kpkg:
>
> fakeroot make-kpkg --options
How will that help. It is actually trying to create a file under
/usr/src while being called as a non-root user. fakeroot won't
magically allow that...
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:13:41 -0500
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed one oddity myself.. I've just been working with make-kpkg, and
> noticed in the output, that when it tried to delete (I think) and
> re-install the debian directory, that if I used --rootcmd fakeroot, it
> reported
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then I tried to compile a module for that kernel:
>
> make-kpkg --append-to-version
> -diamond-grsec-1.9.10+freeswan-ext-1.99+preempt-20030617-2
> --rootcmd fakeroot --added-modules nvidia modules_image
Kernel modules' support for 'make-kpkg --r
On Friday 27 June 2003 11:50 am, martin f krafft wrote:
> I just configured, then made the kernel_image for a custom 2.4.21
> kernel with a couple of patches:
>
> make-kpkg --append-to-version
> -diamond-grsec-1.9.10+freeswan-ext-1.99+preempt-20030617-2
> --revision 20030627.1726 --rootcmd fa
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:50:13 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cp: cannot create regular file
> `/usr/src/modules/nvidia/debian/control': Permission denied
>
> which makes perfect sense, because
>
> diamond:...new/src/linux-2.4.21> id
> uid=1000(madduck) gid=100(users) .
19 matches
Mail list logo
