With regards to the suggestion that some means be provided for admins to
easily install a subset of GNOME that suits the needs of government
and/or US government ...
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:50 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> I suppose you were joking, but in all seriousness, why does _Debian_
> n
[Paul E Condon]
> I suggest Debian add two metapackages: 'gnome-govt' for use by all
> governments and 'gnome-USgovt' for US government in particular. ;-)
I suppose you were joking, but in all seriousness, why does _Debian_
need to add them? Let the site administrator do it, using 'equivs'.
If y
I suggest Debian add two metapackages: 'gnome-govt' for use by all
governments and 'gnome-USgovt' for US government in particular. ;-)
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:09:55PM -0600, Arthur H. Edwards wrote:
> I want to thank all of you for responding. I'm quoting here a response I
> gave to an off-lin
I want to thank all of you for responding. I'm quoting here a response I
gave to an off-line communication because I thought it might be germane
to the discussion. I have expanded my response a little.
I have removed gnome, gnome-desktop-environment and gnome-games with no
apparent side effects
> I work at a government laboratory where computer games are prohibited. I
> also use the gnome desktop. When I try to remove gnome-games apt wanst
> to remove gnome because gnome depends on gnome-games. This is really a
> show-stopper for government use of Linux. Also, I would think that the
5 matches
Mail list logo
