On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:27:14PM +, Andrius wrote:
> Andrius wrote:
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:47:52PM +, Andrius wrote:
>>>
To configure MTA (exim4) is half hour job and it is easy.
How many time person must spent for configuring Mutt?
>>>
>>> For m
Andrius wrote:
Andrius wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:47:52PM +, Andrius wrote:
To configure MTA (exim4) is half hour job and it is easy.
How many time person must spent for configuring Mutt?
For mail to be able to send to the internet you have to activate
addr
Andrius wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:47:52PM +, Andrius wrote:
To configure MTA (exim4) is half hour job and it is easy.
How many time person must spent for configuring Mutt?
For mail to be able to send to the internet you have to activate
address rewriting in
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:47:52PM +, Andrius wrote:
To configure MTA (exim4) is half hour job and it is easy.
How many time person must spent for configuring Mutt?
For mail to be able to send to the internet you have to activate address
rewriting in your MTA ([EMAI
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:55:01PM +, Andrius wrote:
> True, Mutt is really for these who wanna be a *geek*-n00b.
> But using simpliest UNIX command - sorry, it is not n00bish. To learn use
> mail need max hour. While for Mutt. you must devote yourself to become a
> mutant for a months.
At
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:47:52PM +, Andrius wrote:
> To configure MTA (exim4) is half hour job and it is easy.
> How many time person must spent for configuring Mutt?
For mail to be able to send to the internet you have to activate address
rewriting in your MTA ([EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL
On Fri, February 15, 2008 10:41 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
> But he can barely dog paddle and has dived into the deep end.
> That's a recipe for failure and embitterment towards Linux.
Or the best troll ever. :P
--
Steve Lamb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 12:10, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/15
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 11:16, William Pursell wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
Returning to the question about Mutt.
Why to complicate a life when all mailin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 12:10, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
>>
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >> On 02/15/08
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 11:16, William Pursell wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> Why to complicate a life when all mailin
On 2008-02-15 17:16:16 +, William Pursell wrote:
> That's a bit harsh. Sometimes, /usr/bin/mail really is best.
> $ mail user -s subject < file
> is often the best way to get the job done.
You can do something similar with Mutt, and you benefit from MIME
(e.g. if subject has non-ASCII charact
On 2008-02-15 16:07:20 +, Andrius wrote:
> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
> command 'Mail'?
That's the same thing here. :)
vin:~> which mail
mail: aliased to mutt
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
>
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
> >>> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> >>> Why to complicate a
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:07:20PM +, Andrius wrote:
> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
> command 'Mail'?
If you can, go ahead.
I presonally like to be able to use MIME, get mail from a remote IMAP
server, and suc
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
Returning to the question about Mutt.
Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
command 'Mail'?
What the hell does that mean?
That is reflections about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 10:47, Andrius wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
>>> Returning to the question about Mutt.
>>> Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
>>> command 'Mail'?
>>
>> What the hell d
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
Returning to the question about Mutt.
Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
command 'Mail'?
What the hell does that mean?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/08 10:07, Andrius wrote:
> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
> command 'Mail'?
What the hell does that mean?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
PETA - People
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:07:20PM +, Andrius wrote:
> Returning to the question about Mutt.
> Why to complicate a life when all mailing tasks perfectly can do simple
> command 'Mail'?
Why not just telnet port 25 and type raw SMTP?
You can use mail, no question. Mutt adds a lot, is stable a
20 matches
Mail list logo
