On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:45:44PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Hrm, I'd think about sending questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh,
> wait that'd be routed to me ;-}
>
> This is the configuration I run at home (fetchmail/sendmail/procmail) -
> I'll be happy to help in anyway I can.
>
> Send me
, or your class C IP banned.
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Brutsche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin F. Krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Debian-users"
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: mail server question
> -B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> and i propose postfix. then again, i would happily like to hear why
> exim is better (or not).
Exim (in my experience):
* is easier to configure
* is much more flexible
> it looks to me
also sprach Joost Kooij (on Sat, 30 Jun 2001 09:35:09PM +0200):
> Stick with exim, which is debian's default. Much easier to configure,
> larger debian userbase, so more likely that you get an answer on
> debian-user.
and i propose postfix. then again, i would happily like to hear why
exim is bet
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 02:16:12PM -0500, Brad Cramer wrote:
[sendmail hassles]
Stick with exim, which is debian's default. Much easier to configure,
larger debian userbase, so more likely that you get an answer on
debian-user.
BTW, for smtp to work, your dns must make sense too. Figure that ou
5 matches
Mail list logo
