On 2016-08-13 16:01, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Ok, now I know it is not my box sending mail, as I diconnected it from
> the network, and received about 50 of those mails with shown time
> while it was not on the net.
> I will not worry about them, and kill them.
> Thank you
It's nothing more you
On 13/08/2016 16:46, Hans wrote:
Hi!
Had a similar problem some years ago. Many mail servers sent me a "could not
deliver" rejectmails (about 50-100 mails, which could be easily ruled by
spamassassin).
Someone misused my e-mail address, so I get all the stuff back. I guess, it
will also be ea
Hi!
Had a similar problem some years ago. Many mail servers sent me a "could not
deliver" rejectmails (about 50-100 mails, which could be easily ruled by
spamassassin).
Someone misused my e-mail address, so I get all the stuff back. I guess, it
will also be easy to fake the senders ip address.
Hi,
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Since yesterday I receive those mails:
> ...
> This is the mail system at host mail.blninja.com.
Very obscure domain. They threaten you with the death penalty if you
dare to visit them.
Are you in any relation with them ?
> : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[64.233
(sorry for the bad quoting, I seem to have missed the beginning of the
thread)
| =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6geli_Marc?= said:
| I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that
| every e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my
nate muttered:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6geli_Marc?= said:
> > Hi everybody
> >
> > I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that
> > every e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my
> > "incoming" folder at "/var/spool/exim". Shouldn't this e-mail be
> > forwardet to
=?iso-8859-1?Q?V=F6geli_Marc?= said:
> Hi everybody
>
> I use Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 and the Exim MTA. The problem is that
> every e-mail I send to my server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) stays in my
> "incoming" folder at "/var/spool/exim". Shouldn't this e-mail be
> forwardet to user's e-mail directory?
mos
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 12:55:56PM -0800, George A. Dowding wrote:
> I am using exim as my MTA. I have a DSL with a static IP. Every once
> in a while mail can not be delivered to certain hosts. I have
> sucessfully sent a one line message to that host, but anything larger
> causes this time ou
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Allan M. Wind wrote:
wind >Is this the correct format?
from what i could see on www.sendmail.org it is ..
wind >Hmm... that sounds like normal behavior to me. If you serve the
wind >domain and the user doesn't exist, sendmail should correctly
wind >reject mail.
i'd hope it
On 2000-01-23 16:35:54, aphro wrote:
> i reconfigured sendmail to use
> mailertables(via sendmailconfig) and set /etc/mail/mailertable to include:
>
> .aphroland.orgsmtp:firetrail.com
> .mac-resources.comsmtp:firetrail.com
Is this the correct format?
> but it appeaars it is ignoring
On 2000-01-23 14:46:28, aphro wrote:
> wind >Clearly, you are hosting something on galactica, otherwise mail for
> wind >your "local" user would be forwarded to your other machine. What is
> wind >the mx record for galactica? Do you have a domain hosted on bebo and
> wind >some users from that d
Ok..i've been playing around with this for the past 2 hours and still its
not doing what i'm expecting it to do ..(i just ordered the sendmail book
from www.ora.com to help me too) i reconfigured sendmail to use
mailertables(via sendmailconfig) and set /etc/mail/mailertable to include:
.aphroland.
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Allan M. Wind wrote:
wind >Clearly, you are hosting something on galactica, otherwise mail for
wind >your "local" user would be forwarded to your other machine. What is
wind >the mx record for galactica? Do you have a domain hosted on bebo and
wind >some users from that doma
On 2000-01-22 22:39:50, aphro wrote:
> I have 2 machines that handle 99% of my accounts. 1 is acting mail
> server(bebo.firetrail.com) and the other does everything
> else(galactica.firetrail.com)
>
> all of the domains i host MX to mail.firetrail.com (which goes to
> bebo.firetrail.com).
Ok.
>> "SZ" == Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SZ> I called my linux box virge. I didn't use the standard host.domain
SZ> format. So what is the best solution for this?? Thx.
Use the host.domain format.
Edit /etc/hosts
find /etc/ -type f | xargs grep virge
will find other files containing
Rick Jones wrote:
>
> Pete:
>
> I have been able to get my email to go through. There has most
> definately been a change someplace, here.
>
> I had to use the reply-to field and change my from to my systems idea
> of who I am for it to work. This means that anybody without a s
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> As long as the MX wasn't set up, I got a reply from the mailsystem (DNS
> lookup failed for internet-treff.uni-koeln.de) if I tried to send mail
> from the system. The same for mails to the system using the MX address
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
This
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Well, my conclusion is that you've done something to the basic smail
> satellite option - specifically, your /etc/smail/directors file has
> something in it besides the smartuser director. What you appended of your
> configuration isn't enough to tell.
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> > > Use the option "satellite system".
> >
> > No - DON'T. Satellite is useful if and only if all the usernames of
> > any account that will ever receive any mail are either mentioned in
> > /etc/aliases or match the usernames on your smarthost. A
> > Use the option "satellite system".
>
> No - DON'T. Satellite is useful if and only if all the usernames of
> any account that will ever receive any mail are either mentioned in
> /etc/aliases or match the usernames on your smarthost. Among other
> things, the satellite setup makes using fetc
Daniel Martin writes:
> Among other things, the satellite setup makes using fetchmail near
> impossible. I personally think that a big warning should be issued if
> you choose this option, as people seem to think that it's the appropriate
> choice for intermittently connect PPP machines.
It seems
Daniel Martin writes:
> Among other things, the satellite setup makes using fetchmail near
> impossible. I personally think that a big warning should be issued if
> you choose this option, as people seem to think that it's the appropriate
> choice for intermittently connect PPP machines.
It seems
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Unga Synskadade Smaland Blekinge / Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> > Now that I have went over to using PPP over a modem line, I have got some
> > trouble. The problem is that I have no official hostname. Therefore, I
> > call my host p
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Unga Synskadade Smaland Blekinge / Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Now that I have went over to using PPP over a modem line, I have got some
> trouble. The problem is that I have no official hostname. Therefore, I
> call my host peter. I have configured smail for "Internet site"
> (smai
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Unga Synskadade Smaland Blekinge / Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Does anyone know how to force smail not to check that the host on the
> From: address is valid. Another solution would be to get the From: line to
> be rewritten to "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". I can't find a way to get
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
