On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Karen Lewellen wrote:
greetings folks,
Going to ask this question very carefully and I hope tight enough to stay
focused on the question smiles.
My nonprofit organization has a hosting account with dream host.
www.dreamhost.com
As a part of the account we get a shell plat
hi karen.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Karen Lewellen wrote:
greetings folks,
My nonprofit organization has a hosting account with dream host.
www.dreamhost.com
As a part of the account we get a shell platform, text based
fortunately for me. Because dreamhost uses debian for its accounts,
the shell opt
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:38:02PM -0400, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Is there a comparative mail client to alpine that is text focused
> and comes standard in the console edition of debian that I might
> explore?
Mutt [1] should come with default Debian installation. It's text based,
CLI interface
-
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 16:12 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> My apologies for screwing up the quote.
Never mind!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/135408
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:54:07AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> It would be nice to correct the quotation. I didn't wrote this. I didn't
> reply to this thread any more and somebody else did wrote those words,
> but it's quoted in a way, that people might think I've written this.
>
> Wrong quot
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:44 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Your intent is seen by those who can read. That is all that matters.
I don't worry that e.g. the Mossard will google and then kill me ;) or
the German prosecution and then they will sue me ;). But an employer
might google and then read
"
On 11/27/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Take a look what mails are from me and what mails are from others and
> take care about the fact that I was silent, I only replied when it
> became to insane.
>
> Discredit, defamation, lies!
>
> In the archive it's easy to see what mails, what words are from me
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:07 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:00:05PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> > > It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> > > to exterminate the Jews, to indicat
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:58:08PM +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
>
> This is, after all, a specialised list, not a comedy central.
You are joking, aren't you?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:00:05PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> > It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> > to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was misunderstood.
>
> I made a joke with the
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 18:02 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > >
> > > On 26/11/12 13:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> > >>> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> > >>> to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it wa
> >
> > On 26/11/12 13:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> >>> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> >>> to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was
> >>> misunderstood.
>
> > Arrogant Bastard!
> >
Hoff
>> To: Ralf Mardorf
>> Subject: Re: Outrageous Xenophobia. Was: Outrageous sexism. Was: Re:
>> Mail client, threads, etc...
>> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:24:41 +
>>
>> On 26/11/12 13:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, To
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
> I anyway received mail from the admin.
Is it possible that we read it? It could be convenient to know what is
happening with Debian's view point.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
> Forwarded Message
> From: Tony van der Hoff
> To: Ralf Mardorf
> Subject: Re: Outrageous Xenophobia. Was: Outrageous sexism. Was: Re:
> Mail client, threads, etc...
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:24:41 +
>
> On 26/11/12 13:00, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Veljko wrote:
> [cut] And people should forgive
> each other, especially when they apologize. So shall we forgive each
> others and just move on? For crying out loud... Just drop it...
>
>
> Veljko
Seconded!
There is no such thing as universal joke. We always wi
My point is clear now, I think jokes here is a bad idea because of
the
problems they can give, but I understand if others disagrees. One can
always use a good laugh, and I am always searching for new jokes :-)
(I just think they will give more grief than laughs here)
- Titanus
Even jokes on
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:45:52 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:28 +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:04 +0100
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > IMO nothing can be bad with a joke about men, women, Germans, Jews
> > > etc., it becomes bad if
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:28 +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:04 +0100
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > IMO nothing can be bad with a joke about men, women, Germans, Jews
> > > etc., it becomes bad if pe
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:28 +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:04 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
>
> > IMO nothing can be bad with a joke about men, women, Germans, Jews
> > etc., it becomes bad if people have got bad intentions. Tony has got
> > a bad intention or he's
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:28 +0100, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:04 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
>
> > IMO nothing can be bad with a joke about men, women, Germans, Jews
> > etc., it becomes bad if people have got bad intentions. Tony has got
> > a bad intention or he's
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:28:04PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IMO nothing can be bad with a joke about men, women, Germans, Jews etc.,
> it becomes bad if people have got bad intentions.
I just couldn't agree more. I refuse to accept that people on this list
are malicious. People are helping oth
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:28:04 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IMO nothing can be bad with a joke about men, women, Germans, Jews
> etc., it becomes bad if people have got bad intentions. Tony has got
> a bad intention or he's serious sick and not aware about the
> difference of the order to kill peo
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:45 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:53:18 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> >This isn't a joke, since I'm from Germany and a lot of people really
> >were killed by Nazis.
>
> And there we have it; You don't find this funny. Many people
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:45 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:53:18 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> >This isn't a joke, since I'm from Germany and a lot of people really
> >were killed by Nazis.
>
> And there we have it; You don't find this funny. Many people
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:44 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:31 +0100, darkestkhan wrote:
Tony wrote, not darkestkhan (not my mistake, the DE and MUA are broken),
pardon
> > >> >> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the
> > >> >> order
> > >> >> t
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:31 +0100, darkestkhan wrote:
> >> >> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> >> >> to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was
> >> >> misunderstood.
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 11:36 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Your joke was
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:53:18 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hello Ralf,
>This isn't a joke, since I'm from Germany and a lot of people really
>were killed by Nazis.
And there we have it; You don't find this funny. Many people didn't
find your comment about women funny.
You lose. Get over it. Mo
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:44 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> Le 26.11.2012 14:34, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> > On 11/27/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> >>> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 00:34 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 11/27/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
>> >> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
>> >> to ext
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 00:34 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 11/27/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> >> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> >> to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was misunde
It's not marked as [off-list], but by accident send off-list.
I've got enough from this list.
Forwarded Message
From: Tony van der Hoff
To: Ralf Mardorf
Subject: Re: Outrageous Xenophobia. Was: Outrageous sexism. Was: Re:
Mail client, threads, etc...
Date: Mon, 26 N
Le 26.11.2012 14:34, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
On 11/27/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the
order
to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was
misunderstood.
I made a j
On 11/27/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
>> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
>> to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was misunderstood.
>
> I made a joke with the contend
>
> "Men tend to make m
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:27 +, Tony van der Hoff
> It is alleged, that a certain German Fuerer added a smiley to the order
> to exterminate the Jews, to indicate it was a joke. It was misunderstood.
I made a joke with the contend
"Men tend to make mistakes, when they are in love with a women
On 26/11/12 11:45, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 26.11.2012 01:56, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
>> On 11/26/12, Neal Murphy wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
>>>
>>> OK. Pointed, direct humor
Le 26.11.2012 01:56, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
On 11/26/12, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
OK. Pointed, direct humor back at you. What was the shortest book
ever
published? "One Thousand Year
On 11/26/12, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> ... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
>
> OK. Pointed, direct humor back at you. What was the shortest book ever
> published? "One Thousand Years of German Humor", which consisted of the
>
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:54:33 PM Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> ... My humour is less good than Chaplin's ...
OK. Pointed, direct humor back at you. What was the shortest book ever
published? "One Thousand Years of German Humor", which consisted of the
frontispiece, the preface, and the introd
On Mi, 21 nov 12, 14:40:58, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> Obviously, Debian is working so well, for everybody, that we need
> something to keep the list from becoming dead air :-)
It happens during the freeze.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://li
Le 22.11.2012 22:07, Beco a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, François TOURDE
wrote:
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Lisi Reisz écrivait:
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can
see in
this first use in 1982:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, François TOURDE wrote:
> Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> Lisi Reisz écrivait:
>
>> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
>>> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
>>> this first use in 1982:
>>
>> That is what is so ve
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Apologize!
As a point of reference, I think the word you were looking for there was
"apologies", as in "Please accept my apologies".
Cheers,
Tom
--
The hater of property and of government takes care to have his warranty
deed recor
Le Mer 21 novembre 2012 19:12, Brad Rogers a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:41:08 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
>
>> I'm not sure, if it's really just the language barrier. Coarse humour
>>
>
> I picked up your intent, but clearly others didn't. At least one other
> person inv
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:11:08 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 23:28 +0100, François TOURDE wrote:
> > Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> > Lisi Reisz écrivait:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> > >> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke.
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 23:28 +0100, François TOURDE wrote:
> Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> Lisi Reisz écrivait:
>
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> >> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> >> this first use in 1982:
> >
> > That is what i
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Ralf Mardorf écrivait:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 10:28 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
>> > fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
>> >
>> > > - Errare humanum est, but to make a big mistake, you need a
>> > > computer ;)
>> >
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Lisi Reisz écrivait:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
>> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
>> this first use in 1982:
>
> That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
> over half
Florian Snow wrote:
Ok, I understand that you were offended by Ralf's original "joke", but
is it really necessary to make an already heated debate worse by
making statements like yours? Ralf already explained that he actually
meant to apologize and didn't ask for an apology and others already
Lisi Reisz :
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:13:18 Brad Rogers wrote:
"Apologize!" means you're demanding an apology from someone else.
He probably is!
Ok, I understand that you were offended by Ralf's original "joke", but
is it really necessary to make an already heated debate worse by ma
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 -0300, Beco wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> >> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> >> this first use in 1982:
> >
> > That is what is so very offens
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
>> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
>> this first use in 1982:
>
> That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
> over half o
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 18:12 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:41:08 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> >I'm not sure, if it's really just the language barrier. Coarse humour
>
> I picked up your intent, but clearly others didn't. At least one other
> person involv
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 19:45 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 10:28 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> > > fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
> > >
> > > > - Errare humanum est, but to make a big mistake, you need a
> > > > computer ;)
>
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 10:28 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> > fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
> >
> > > - Errare humanum est, but to make a big mistake, you need a
> > > computer ;)
> >
> > Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>
> Sending mess
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:41:08 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hello Ralf,
>I'm not sure, if it's really just the language barrier. Coarse humour
I picked up your intent, but clearly others didn't. At least one other
person involved in this rigmarole is not a native English speaker. As
such, it's ess
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:46 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> > Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> > this first use in 1982:
>
> That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
> over h
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:13:18 Brad Rogers wrote:
> >Since I'm kill-filed you can't read it any more. Apologize! But I
>
> You should say either "I apologise" or "My apologies".
>
> "Apologize!" means you're demanding an apology from someone else.
He probably is!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:55:22 Beco wrote:
> Use of smiley face should point this was just a joke. As we can see in
> this first use in 1982:
That is what is so very offensive. He thinks that being so rude about just
over half of the population is _funny_. As apparently do you.
Lisi
-
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 17:13 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:47:20 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> >Since I'm kill-filed you can't read it any more. Apologize! But I
>
> You should say either "I apologise" or "My apologies".
>
> "Apologize!" means you're deman
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 18:04 +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Darac Marjal:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Actually, that is quite sexist. In fact, it's plain and simply sexist
> >>> which is in
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:47:20 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hello Ralf,
>Since I'm kill-filed you can't read it any more. Apologize! But I
You should say either "I apologise" or "My apologies".
"Apologize!" means you're demanding an apology from someone else.
--
Regards _
/ )
Darac Marjal:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, that is quite sexist. In fact, it's plain and simply sexist
>>> which is inappropriate in this community.
>>
>> Apologize!
>
> I most certainl
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> > > > fr
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:34 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>>
>> It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
>
Lisi Reisz:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>
> It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
> well?
I think you got Ralf wrong. He did not want to express that women are
not human but "to make
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:43:33 Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> > >
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:34 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
>
> It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
> well?
>
> I'm going to protect myself from you by kill-f
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> > > fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
> > >
> > > > - Errare
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:00 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> > fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
> >
> > > - Errare humanum est, but to make a big mistake, you need a
> > > computer ;)
> >
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 15:51:24 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
It is, extremely. My husband says do you not think a woman is humanum as
well?
I'm going to protect myself from you by kill-filing you. You are utterly,
utterly beyond the pale.
Lisi
--
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:51:24PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
> fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
>
> > - Errare humanum est, but to make a big mistake, you need a
> > computer ;)
>
> :D
>
> Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
Actually, that i
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:10:11 +0100
fra...@tourde.org (François TOURDE) wrote:
> - Errare humanum est, but to make a big mistake, you need a
> computer ;)
:D
Or a woman. I hope this isn't too sexist.
Regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Ralf Mardorf écrivait:
> François, a good idea to open a new subject, but keeping the id.
And Gnus, on reply on this kind of subjects, ask me if I want to remove
the [Was: ] ...
> We should be aware that newbies never ever will use (e)lisp to set up
> preferences f
François, a good idea to open a new subject, but keeping the id. Others
might think, this is bad too. I say, use a client that enables to
select, as you want the selection, even if people "use" the id in
different ways.
> But it has powerfull possibilities, and is customisable using Lisp.
>
> May
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 11:10:46 François TOURDE wrote:
> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3
>
> As marked on his message.
Do'h. :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:35, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 the mental interface of
>
> bob parker told:
> > A while ago I thought I saw some reference to a package that could get
> > the headers from the mail server into a file. That file could then be
> > edited to remove the items
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 the mental interface of
bob parker told:
> A while ago I thought I saw some reference to a package that could get the
> headers from the mail server into a file. That file could then be edited to
> remove the items to be kept and the remainder of the file used to instruct
>
* Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020406 09:41]:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:24:21PM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> > Is that any mail client that supports maildirs, other than Mutt of
> > course?
>
> I seem to remember that KMail uses a Maildir-ish format...I switched
> to mutt a while back tho, so I'm not
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:24:21PM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> Is that any mail client that supports maildirs, other than Mutt
> of course?
I seem to remember that KMail uses a Maildir-ish format...I switched
to mutt a while back tho, so I'm not sure.
-rob
--
I did not vote for the Australian governme
begin Karsten Heymann quotation:
> * Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020403 21:06]:
> > * Jeff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020402 22:17]:
> > > Is that any mail client that supports maildirs, other than Mutt
> > > of course?
> >
> > I know of at least gnus, and there's a patch for pine, which, IIRC,
* Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020403 21:06]:
> * Jeff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020402 22:17]:
> > Is that any mail client that supports maildirs, other than Mutt
> > of course?
>
> I know of at least gnus, and there's a patch for pine, which, IIRC, is
> included if you apt-get source pine. Also,
* Jeff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020402 22:17]:
> Is that any mail client that supports maildirs, other than Mutt
> of course?
I know of at least gnus, and there's a patch for pine, which, IIRC, is
included if you apt-get source pine. Also, I just found out that GNU
mailx does support maildir. I'm sure
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:44:23AM +1000, James wrote:
| Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I don't have this email
| address subscribed to the list, and I can't check my subscribed address
| without messing anything up at the moment.
|
| I am having trouble finding a mail client that can
On 21/01/02 James did speaketh:
> I am having trouble finding a mail client that can do these things:
> - Allow more than one identity, and to choose what identity is used when
> composing and replying to mail
> - Choose a different SMTP server for each identity
> - Filter mail on Subject, From,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 January 2002 5:44 pm, James wrote:
> Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I don't have this email
> address subscribed to the list, and I can't check my subscribed address
> without messing anything up at the moment.
>
> I am having t
Nathan Weston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, My school just switched to a new mail server, and without
> warning began requiring SMTP authentication to send mail off
> campus. I've been using KMail which doesn't seem to support this.
>
> At the moment I have Sylpheed installed, but it's eve
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:15:31AM -0500, Nathan Weston wrote:
| Hello,
| My school just switched to a new mail server, and without warning
| began requiring SMTP authentication to send mail off campus. I've
| been using KMail which doesn't seem to support this.
|
| At the moment I have Sylpheed i
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:31:38PM +0100, Liam Ward wrote:
> Do any of these mail readers allow selective download from a POP
> server? In other words, I want to view the message headers and choose
> the ones I wish to download. I access my work mail from home and
> sometimes get large attachmen
Truthfully, I'm not sure - given that I use 2 email systems:
Personal mail: I use fetchmail to pop the mail off the server, and procmail
to filter it into various mailboxes.
Work mail: We have an IMAP server setup - which is (sortof) like doing email
like you would newsgroups - you download a me
Do any of these mail readers allow selective download from a POP
server? In other words, I want to view the message headers and choose
the ones I wish to download. I access my work mail from home and
sometimes get large attachments that I could choose not to download
when I'm dialing in from ho
I have to second this. mutt is OUTSTANDING. It does have a small learning
curve, however, so be forewarned. If you need any help setting it up, there
are PLENTY of mutt users on this list (including myself) who would be
willing to help.
-b3
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:28:25AM -0600, ray p wrot
The same mail client I use everywhere mutt or course.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Ales Jerman wrote:
> Which X Mail clent to use under FVWM2?
> Thanks!
> Bye,
>
>
> Ale?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Ales Jerman wrote:
> Which X Mail clent to use under FVWM2?
> Thanks!
> Bye,
>
Netscape mail or kmail if you have kde installed. You could search
around in http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
for possibilities.
kent
--
From seeing and seeing the se
My apologies to alson for the confusion, just started typo-ing away.
Should've been Matthew ...
-Original Message-
From: Joris Lambrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 2 april 2001 17:36
To: 'Alson van der Meulen'; Debian User List
Subject: RE: mail client tha
ults.
The newest kernel brings a 'real' firewall with it and i guess there are
plenty of proxy products out there for linux.
greets,
joris
-Original Message-
From: Alson van der Meulen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 2 april 2001 17:00
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: m
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:29:59PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 04:29:39PM -0800, Matheson Cameron wrote:
> > Wow,
> >
> > sorry everyone. It appears my proxy server just sucks
> > (Analog X). Mail doesn't work through any of the
> > computers, even the Windoze ones
Cameron Matheson wrote:
>I want to have a POP mail account very badly (I'm
>getting sick of using this online account), but I
>can't get Mozilla's mail client to work through my
>proxy server. I did everything in the directions, but
>it just didn't work. Anyone know of one that works
>(or if I'm
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 04:29:39PM -0800, Matheson Cameron wrote:
> Wow,
>
> sorry everyone. It appears my proxy server just sucks
> (Analog X). Mail doesn't work through any of the
> computers, even the Windoze ones (I set them all up as
> the Analog instructions told me to). Anyone want to
>
Wow,
sorry everyone. It appears my proxy server just sucks
(Analog X). Mail doesn't work through any of the
computers, even the Windoze ones (I set them all up as
the Analog instructions told me to). Anyone want to
suggest a better proxy server?
Thanks,
Cameron Matheson
--- Matheson Cameron
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
