On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 02:49:36AM -0600, Alex Romosan wrote:
> the problem is the missing link to /var/spool from /usr/spool. since
base-files_1.6.1 has removed this link as it is against FHS, it might be put
back in before the release, but it is good that we can find "broken"
packages now.
> t
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 02:49:36AM -0600, Alex Romosan wrote:
> people). which brings up one of the things that i am beginning to find
> annoying about linux these days: this so called file system standard,
> which seems to be getting weirder and weirder every day, and more and
> more different tha
the problem is the missing link to /var/spool from /usr/spool. since
there are no references to /usr/spool/lpd in lpd, this most certainly
comes from the /etc/printcap file. it certainly does on my system (the
printcap is generated automatically by the distributed printing
people). which brings up
On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 08:28:52PM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 1998 at 03:16:44PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 11:08:28AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> > > I'm the maintainer of the lpr package, and there is a bug report
> > > saying that remote printing does
On Thu, Feb 19, 1998 at 03:16:44PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 11:08:28AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> > I'm the maintainer of the lpr package, and there is a bug report
> > saying that remote printing doesn't work. Has anyone else had this
> > problem?
>
> Well, it works
On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 11:08:28AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of the lpr package, and there is a bug report
> saying that remote printing doesn't work. Has anyone else had this
> problem?
Well, it works just fine here from 5.9-20.2 (client) to 5.9-20 (server),
and from 5.9-21 t
6 matches
Mail list logo
