Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> prover wrote:
>> I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] IS ONLY FORWARD FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>> WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
>> EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
>> CAN YOU DO SOMETH
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:58:23AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> prover wrote:
> >I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >([EMAIL PROTECTED] IS ONLY FORWARD FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> Is anyone able to help this person?
I understand the listmasters have been in conta
prover wrote:
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED] IS ONLY FORWARD FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
THANK YOU.
Is anyone able to hel
on Fri, May 31, 2002, Daniel Toffetti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Can someone tell me what is the agreed upon method on this list for
> > saying thanks.
> >
> > There were so many replies to my questions it would be a very long
> > job to reply to everyone individually with thanks, though if tha
> Can someone tell me what is the agreed upon method on this list for
> saying thanks.
> There were so many replies to my questions it would be a very long
> job to reply to everyone individually with thanks, though if thats
> how it goes thats what I'll do.
I think there is no standard method, I
I think the best way to say thanks - and als Netiquette compatible -
is to stay tuned and help others the way others helped you.
HAND.
Frank
--
$ Hello World!
$ I am [Ff]rank ;)
1024D/EC4CE5CC 2002-05-14 Frank Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fingerprint =
also sprach Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.05.31.0816 +0200]:
> Can someone tell me what is the agreed upon method on this list for saying
> thanks.
this is fine. maybe you should reply to your original post just to
keep the association to the thread. or, if your original email had
a subje
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley wrote:
> I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box handy
> (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
Why you need procmail?
If you have one fixed IP machine, run Linux there and access it through
SSH
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:21:59AM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
[...]
>
> Any comments on the topic of forging addresses[0]?
>
> 0: No, this isn't personal, either, just an attempt to get back
> on-topic.
>
i've only read a couple of messages in this thread and all i can say is
forging address
(sending to alex, too, cause I guess he's not subscribed here ATM)
On Tue, 02 Oct 2001 22:48:27 BST, P Kirk writes:
>>And for unsubscribing here:
>>- I'm only one person, if you have problems with me, say so, I'll just
>> do the equivalent of killfiling you.
>>- if you use debian, it's probably
>And for unsubscribing here:
>- I'm only one person, if you have problems with me, say so, I'll just
> do the equivalent of killfiling you.
>- if you use debian, it's probably a quite good idea to participate here
>- as for unpleasant: that's just life, I'm afraid.
>
The joy of the Internet is th
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 11:40:57 BST, Alex Hunsley writes:
>Robert Waldner wrote:
>> And for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: well, you obviously need a more
>> reliable way to bloody *always* include your .sig... Btw, is
>> privacy.com your domain or are you affiliated? I'd guess no, and they
>> probably be wo
on Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
>
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> >
> > on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> >
> > > I read my email from several places, not all
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 11:55:10PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>...
> Second: Last time this topic surfaced, indications were that procmail
> doesn't work with the legacy MS Window
Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 20:03:14 CDT, Hall Stevenson writes:
> >* Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010930 16:54]:
> >> I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box
> >> handy (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
> >
> >I use Out
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> > I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box
> > handy (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
>
> Firs
>
> or imap (allow ssl connections only ssl)
>
> that way you can use various MUAs and still have consistent email
>folders (what you do using one (instance) of MUA is visible to all other
>MUAs, no file locking problems etc.)
>
> erik
>
IMAP is a good choice. I have mutt on one box and O
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> > I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box
> > handy (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
>
> First
on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box
> handy (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
First choice: ssh tunnel to your GNU/Linux box.
Alex Hunsley wrote:
>
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> >
> > on Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:02:16PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > Who runs the debian list?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > I emailed the list owner address a little while ago and haven't
> > > received a r
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 20:03:14 CDT, Hall Stevenson writes:
>* Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010930 16:54]:
>> I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box
>> handy (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
>
>I use Outlook Express when I'm at work and have
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley wrote:
| "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
| > I'd recommend spending less time harranging the overworked list and more
| > investing in a solid set of procmail filters.
|
| I would hardly describe a suggestion sent to list admin as "harranging".
|
* Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010930 16:54]:
> I read my email from several places, not all of which have a linux box
> handy (e.g. work). Is there a promail equivelent for windows?
I use Outlook Express when I'm at work and have set up various rules for
putting mail from different lists
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> on Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:02:16PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > Who runs the debian list?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I emailed the list owner address a little while ago and haven't
> > received a response.
>
> > What I said in this emai
on Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:02:16PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Who runs the debian list?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I emailed the list owner address a little while ago and haven't
> received a response.
> What I said in this email was: I think that it is
> an omission not to
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:02:16PM +0100, Alex Hunsley wrote:
> Who runs the debian list? I emailed the list owner address a little
> while ago and haven't received a response. What I said in this email
> was: I think that it is an omission not to say in the confirm list
> subscription email messag
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 13:20:43 BST, Alex Hunsley writes:
>> But OTOH, I post here since ~ 2 years, with an unmangled address, and
>> haven't seen any increase in spam.
>
>Yeah, I suppose a debian usenet group isn't the most likely place to trawl for
>email address. I'm not sure I the trawlers targe
Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 13:02:16 BST, Alex Hunsley writes:
> >Who runs the debian list? I emailed the list owner address a little while ago
> >and haven't received a response. What I said in this email was: I think that
> >i
> >t
> >is an omission not to say in the confirm l
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 13:02:16 BST, Alex Hunsley writes:
>Who runs the debian list? I emailed the list owner address a little while ago
>and haven't received a response. What I said in this email was: I think that i
>t
>is an omission not to say in the confirm list subscription email message that
>a
29 matches
Mail list logo
