Re: linuxconf can not work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 January 2002 04:09 pm, ben wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2002 01:28 pm, John Hasler wrote: > > Ron Johnson writes: > > > There's also "broken" like, what if I was using linuxconf to configure > > > certain things. Then, when I reboot, cer

Re: linuxconf can not work

On Friday 11 January 2002 01:28 pm, John Hasler wrote: > Ron Johnson writes: > > There's also "broken" like, what if I was using linuxconf to configure > > certain things. Then, when I reboot, certain things aren't started > > correctly. > > Then linuxconf is badly broken. i used, then tossed, li

Re: linuxconf can not work

Ron Johnson writes: > There's also "broken" like, what if I was using linuxconf to configure > certain things. Then, when I reboot, certain things aren't started > correctly. Then linuxconf is badly broken. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin

Re: linuxconf can not work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 January 2002 12:35 pm, John Hasler wrote: > Ron Johnson writes: > > No dependancy problems. That doesn't mean that removing it wouldn't put > > the machine is a broken state, though, the next time it boots > > Yes it does. Well, there's

Re: linuxconf can not work

Ron Johnson writes: > No dependancy problems. That doesn't mean that removing it wouldn't put > the machine is a broken state, though, the next time it boots Yes it does. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: linuxconf can not work

* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 11 January 2002 11:37 am, John Hasler wrote: > > Ron Johnson writes: > > > What are the ramifications of removing linuxconf? > > > > A little more space on your disk. > > > > > Woody installed

Re: linuxconf can not work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 January 2002 11:37 am, John Hasler wrote: > Ron Johnson writes: > > What are the ramifications of removing linuxconf? > > A little more space on your disk. > > > Woody installed it by default... > > Then there is strange a bug somewhere.

Re: linuxconf can not work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 January 2002 11:32 am, dman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] > Why would woody install it by default? I've installed woody (well, > potato base then dist-upgrade) and it didn't try to install it

Re: linuxconf can not work

Ron Johnson writes: > What are the ramifications of removing linuxconf? A little more space on your disk. > Woody installed it by default... Then there is strange a bug somewhere. Linuxconf is 'Priority: optional'. More likely, either you installed it or you installed something that depends on

Re: linuxconf can not work

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | On Friday 11 January 2002 10:05 am, dman wrote: | > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:27:52PM +0800, wang wrote: | [snip] | > and throw linuxconf away. It's for RedHat systems, not Debian,

Re: linuxconf can not work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 January 2002 10:05 am, dman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:27:52PM +0800, wang wrote: [snip] > and throw linuxconf away. It's for RedHat systems, not Debian, and > likely won't do any good on a Debian system. Instead use $EDITOR for

Re: linuxconf can not work

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, wang wrote: > HELLO! > i build a sys with debain 2.4.17 kernel > linuxconf 1.26r4-1 > i used linuxconf to change ip address but it no use > System stilly have the old ip address > How can i debug this ? > Many thanks > Forget it. Use webmi

Re: linuxconf can not work

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:27:52PM +0800, wang wrote: | HELLO! | i build a sys with debain 2.4.17 kernel | linuxconf 1.26r4-1 | i used linuxconf to change ip address but it no use | System stilly have the old ip address | How can i debug this ? first man interfac

Re: Linuxconf

step 1: apt-get --purge remove linuxconf step 2: man interfaces step 3: editor /etc/network/interfaces step 4: /etc/init.d/networking restart On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:32:46PM +, SamBozo Debian User wrote: > I have my Deb box on a 192.168.1.xxx network which deb setup during > install. >

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

also sprach Jason (on Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:12:18PM -0600): > $ifconfig but that wouldn't be permanent... /etc/network/interfaces is used during rcS to set them up with every reboot. martin [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@@.net -- the young lady

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

You'll forgive me if i forgot the first "$" on the first $ARGV[0] - Original Message - From: "Chris Matta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MaD dUCK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Debian Users List" Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:10 PM S

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

also sprach Glenn Becker (on Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:04:17PM -0500): > wow, thanks, all - i made changes to /etc/network/interfaces and got right > on! away goes linuxconf! woohoo. another one who let go of the redhat sickness. martin [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

TED]> Cc: "Debian Users List" Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:55 PM Subject: Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ... > also sprach Chris Matta (on Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:52:24PM -0500): > > > [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL >

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

Glenn, There is another way to set your ip address. It's late and I've had a few glasses of wineso I don't remember the exact syntax. If you su to root and do an $ifconfig you should be able to set your ip address and subnet that way. You might have to do an ifconfig --help to get the syn

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

wow, thanks, all - i made changes to /etc/network/interfaces and got right on! away goes linuxconf! G _ | // G l e n n B e c k e r

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

also sprach Chris Matta (on Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:52:24PM -0500): > > [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]@@@.net > I gotta say, thats one of the most creative anti-spam email manglings well, thank you . however, it only works in bash unfortunately.

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Debian Users List" Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:46 PM Subject: Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ... > also sprach Glenn Becker (on Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:39:10PM -0500): > > Someone in the #Debian channel on openprojects.net mentioned the linux

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

also sprach Glenn Becker (on Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:39:10PM -0500): > Someone in the #Debian channel on openprojects.net mentioned the linuxconf > package, which I unf did not have installed. I finally got it installed > (from CD) but it so far has not allowed me to connect out (I'm on the > wife's Ma

Re: linuxconf/changing IP setup ...

Edit /etc/network/interfaces it should have all the old info, just replace it with the new stuff! -c - Original Message - From: "Glenn Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Users List" Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:39 PM Subject: linuxconf/changing IP setup ... > > All, > > OK,

Re: linuxconf problems

Also, AFAIK... the linuxconf distributed in Potato states clearly that some things in it work on Debian and some don't in the README.Debian file... You may want to look at that before continuing to use it. Linuxconf is worthless, anyway. Learn to config the box the correct way. :) On Fri, Sep

Re: linuxconf problems

Did you log in as a regular user and su to root and then try to run linuxconf. If so you need to allow root to access the X server, either log in as root or as a regular user type xhosts + which will allow any user to run an X app on the original users X session. Mike

Re: linuxconf for debian

On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 08:26:05PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > is it possible to use linuxconf with debian (2.2) ? Yes, it's packaged, but make sure you read the README.Debian or somesuch file in the /usr/doc/linuxconf dir to see what's currently working and what's broken... I think there are sti

Re: linuxconf for debian

apt-get install linuxconf Ron Rademaker On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Felix Natter wrote: > hi, > > is it possible to use linuxconf with debian (2.2) ? > > thanks, > > -- > Felix Natter > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >

Re: Linuxconf in potato broken?

> Last I looked, the README.Debian file in the linuxconf package clearly > states that linuxconf is still very broken on Debian. That's okay. Many of my Red Hat-using friends also report more than their share of bugs in it. :-) -- Regards, | Moore's Law: Every 2 years CPU power will double.

Re: Linuxconf in potato broken?

On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 01:40:48PM +, "F.P. Groeneveld" wrote: Last I looked, the README.Debian file in the linuxconf package clearly states that linuxconf is still very broken on Debian. However, it DOES at least RUN on my machines? > I get a segfault whenever I quit linuxconf (version 1.1

NDN(2): Re: linuxconf

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

NDN(2): Re: linuxconf

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

NDN: Re: linuxconf

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

NDN: Re: linuxconf

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

NDN: Re: linuxconf

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

RE: linuxconf

, so I never used it. But the X package and the rest seemed to work fine! Rod... > -Original Message- > From: Johannes Beigel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 1999 3:11 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: linuxconf > > > &q

NDN: Re: linuxconf

Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

Re: linuxconf

"Person, Roderick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is a linuxconf in the debian experimental archives. Where can I get experimental packages? Are they even more unstable than packages from unstable/potato? Jojo. -- Johannes Beigel | "Gravity. http://come.to/jojob | It's not

Re: linuxconf

On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 08:23:58AM -0500, Timothy C. Phan wrote: > hi, > > I'd like to know if there is a tools in debian distribution similar the > linuxconf in > redhat? > > Thanks! Yep!. Debian has linuxconf as well. Since Redhat and Debian do things differently, the Debi

RE: linuxconf

There is a linuxconf in the debian experimental archives. It requires libc6 from potatoe and some other stuff from there, it works and is better that the linuxconf that I used (redhat 5.1 version). The X version of the linuxconf is really cool. But, the libc6 from potatoe did like some stuff on my

Re: linuxconf

Last I heard about linuxconf was that it had a negative affect, as it does not follow the debian file structure properly. I guess that if the debs are in experimental then you should not install them on a machine that you arent prepared to trash. John. Oliver Thuns wrote: > > Hi! > > Does anyon

Re: linuxconf experiences?

Stefan Gundel wrote: > > Hello, dear Debian users, > > I consider installing linuxconf on my hamm system in order to facilitate > administration. Has anybody out there already got some experience with > linuxconf? > I tried installing linuxconf (see my help plea to this list on Feb 2). It seeme

Re: linuxconf

Joachim, > Has someone tried out webmin on a Debian 2 system? (I am for much a > newbie in system administration to try it out more than installing it > and looking at it's great looking web interface.) Just tried it yesterday I prefer the interface to linuxconf. Can't do as many things a

Re: linuxconf

On 29 Nov 1998, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote: > Pere Camps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Has anyone succesfully installed linuxconf on debian? If yes, is > > it worth it? > > > I would be more interested in webmin > which looks very interesting. There is only a

Re: linuxconf

Pere Camps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone succesfully installed linuxconf on debian? If yes, is > it worth it? > I would be more interested in webmin which looks very interesting. There is only a Debian 1.3 version available; *not* a deb package -- s

Re: linuxconf

On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Pere Camps wrote: > Hi! > > Has anyone succesfully installed linuxconf on debian? If yes, is > it worth it? At the moment, linuxconf-version 1.10r34 is available in projects/experimental. Recent linuxconf-release is 1.13r7, but the debian-maintainer is obviously to b

Re: Linuxconf

On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 09:21:02AM +0100, Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 wrote: > I friend of mine is running RedHat 5.1 (i have tried to convert him, but > without any luck) and he was telling me that RedHat is now using the Linuxconf > package, and I was wondering how compatiable Linuxconf is wit

Re: Linuxconf

On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Craig Sanders wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Shaya Potter wrote: > > > > the biggest problem with linuxconf is that it replaces sysvinit. > > > Linuxconf has some really nice features and seems like a > > > comprehensive configuration system BUT even if it was 10 times as >

Re: Linuxconf

On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Shaya Potter wrote: > > the biggest problem with linuxconf is that it replaces sysvinit. > > Linuxconf has some really nice features and seems like a > > comprehensive configuration system BUT even if it was 10 times as > > good it still wouldnt be worth losing sysvinit. > > W

Re: Linuxconf

On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Craig Sanders wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Shaya Potter wrote: > > > Some people are against using linuxconf, personally I'm for it, but I > > don't have enough time to try to build the tools neccesart for it b/c > > the biggest problem with linuxconf is that it replace

Re: Linuxconf

On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Shaya Potter wrote: > Some people are against using linuxconf, personally I'm for it, but I > don't have enough time to try to build the tools neccesart for it b/c the biggest problem with linuxconf is that it replaces sysvinit. Linuxconf has some really nice features and s

Re: Linuxconf

Actually we were discussing this on debian-devel a few weeks ago. The problem with it right now is that we need a utility written to make linuxconf really debian complient (so that when ever you install a package linuxconf will now about it). However, it's not just a utility that is needed,

Re: Linuxconf or something like?

Brian C. White wrote: > > > I was wondering if I could use Linuxconf on a Debian system? If not, > > please explain. I think as new user, it would be nice to have admin. > > tool to control most of system config. in one setting.:-) > > "cfengine" is nice if managing a network. I was look for mor

Re: Linuxconf or something like?

> I was wondering if I could use Linuxconf on a Debian system? If not, > please explain. I think as new user, it would be nice to have admin. > tool to control most of system config. in one setting.:-) "cfengine" is nice if managing a network.

Re: Linuxconf or something like?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi all, > >I was wondering if I could use Linuxconf on a Debian system? If not, >please explain. I think as new user, it would be nice to have admin. >tool to control most of system config. in one setting.:-) I had a look a