Re: linux source vs kernel-source

2004-11-17 Thread Russ Cook
thanks Joerg, When I do apt-get update using unstable, I see kernel-source-2.6.8-8 as most recent version. I didn't know 2.6.9.deb was available, and didn't know where to find it. thanks again, Russ Joerg Johannes wrote: Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2004, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Russ Cook: I genera

Re: linux source vs kernel-source

2004-11-16 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:01:26 -0600, Jeremy Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:59:11PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote: > > Will the linux-* source files compile and build properly using > > the kernel-package tools? > > Yes, they do. I use them on my own machines. I usually do

Re: linux source vs kernel-source

2004-11-16 Thread Jeremy Turner
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:59:11PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote: > Will the linux-* source files compile and build properly using > the kernel-package tools? Yes, they do. I use them on my own machines. I usually download the bz2 kernel and compile from there. I'm not sure what the debian patches to

Re: linux source vs kernel-source

2004-11-16 Thread Joerg Johannes
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2004, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Russ Cook: > I generally compile my own kernel using kernel-package and the > kernel-source packages from the debian sites. But, at ftp.kernel.org > are source files that are 2.6.9 vs 2.6.8. > These files are labeled linux-2.6.9 vs kernel-source-2