Re: linux-kernel-headers foul-up [RESOLVED]

2003-11-08 Thread csj
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 at 06:30:31 +0800, wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 at 11:17:10 +, > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:19:45AM +0800, csj wrote: > > > > > OPTFLAGS = ... -I/usr/local/src/linux/include > > > > /usr/local/src/linux should be the linux kernel source

Re: linux-kernel-headers foul-up [RESOLVED]

2003-11-07 Thread csj
At Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:17:10 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:19:45AM +0800, csj wrote: > > > OPTFLAGS = ... -I/usr/local/src/linux/include > > /usr/local/src/linux should be the linux kernel source code. Apparently yes. I was doing things by trial and error and on

Re: linux-kernel-headers foul-up [RESOLVED]

2003-11-07 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:19:45AM +0800, csj wrote: > OPTFLAGS = ... -I/usr/local/src/linux/include /usr/local/src/linux should be the linux kernel source code. > Why > else would the mplayer developers look for their headers by > default in /usr/include/linux/? /usr/include/linux should be

Re: linux-kernel-headers foul-up [RESOLVED]

2003-11-06 Thread csj
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 00:33:14 +, Colin Watson wrote: [...] > > > Applications that need kernel headers should make and use > > > sanitized private copies of the relevant interfaces in > > > kernel headers. They should never care about what happens > > > to be in /usr/include/{linux,asm}. > > >