On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:01:36 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> I also don't see any zz-lilo hook scripts, which the latest version
> >> of lilo would have installed. Reinstall the latest version of
> >> lilo. This should also install a file
> >> in /etc/initramfs/post-update.d called lilo o
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> > # Kernel image management overrides
> > # See kernel-img.conf(5) for details
> > do_symlinks = no
> > relative_links = yes
> > do_bootloader = no
> > do_bootfloppy = no
> > do_initrd = yes
> > link_in_boot = yes
> > postinst_hook
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:29:34 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:28:00 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> Several problems here. S30initramfs, S50symlink_hook,
>> K30initramfs, and K50symlink_hook, though they will still
>> work, I now consider obsolete. S30initr
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:14:29 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:28:00 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>> I'm also going to need
>> to see the output of the following commands:
>>
>>ls -Al /dev/disk/by-id/
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 26 18:12
> ata-WDC_WD
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:28:00 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Several problems here. S30initramfs, S50symlink_hook,
> K30initramfs, and K50symlink_hook, though they will still
> work, I now consider obsolete. S30initramfs and K30initramfs
> were made obsolete by newer versions of the init
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:28:00 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:40:04 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> I'm also going to need
> to see the output of the following commands:
>
>ls -Al /dev/disk/by-id/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 26 18:12 ata-WDC_WD2500YS-01
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:40:04 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>
> Before I post all that stuff, let me show you exactly what's happening
> on boot. I think there is something very strange going on and it may
> not be lilo.
>
> Lin_img0 is : /boot/vmlinuz
>
> When I boot using that entry
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:54:12 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Stephen Powell put forth on 9/24/2010 4:06 PM:
>> Current stock Debian kernels for the
>> amd64 architecture are right on the ragged edge of being too
>> large for lilo to load below the 16M line
>
> And the bulk of these ~16MB stock
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:17:30 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 9/24/2010 7:42 PM:
>
> > right now I'm thinking I've got something misconfigured, but what ??
> > Running lilo manually should fix whatever's going on and it most
> > certainly isn't.
>
> Did you possibly
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
Before I post all that stuff, let me show you exactly what's happening
on boot. I think there is something very strange going on and it may
not be lilo.
Lin_img0 is : /boot/vmlinuz
When I boot using that entry I get the following
bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 9/24/2010 7:42 PM:
> right now I'm thinking I've got something misconfigured, but what ??
> Running lilo manually should fix whatever's going on and it most
> certainly isn't.
Did you possibly lose your BIOS LBA configuration before the
dist-upgrade, and didn't kno
Stephen Powell put forth on 9/24/2010 4:06 PM:
> Current stock Debian kernels for the
> amd64 architecture are right on the ragged edge of being too
> large for lilo to load below the 16M line
And the bulk of these ~16MB stock kernels is the initrd, correct? Wow
those are huge. I'm so glad I rol
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:42:56 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>
> I've run lilo and rebooted multiple times and always get the same
> result.
Interesting. What happens if you specify
root=802
as an argument to the boot prompt?
> right now I'm thinking I've got something misconfigured
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:06:43 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:10:53 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> >
> > I deleted one of the older images and when it finished I got this
> > mess:
> >
> > Could not find postrm hook script [lilo-update].
> > Looked in: '/bin'
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:10:53 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>
> I deleted one of the older images and when it finished I got this mess:
>
> Could not find postrm hook script [lilo-update].
> Looked in: '/bin', '/sbin', '/usr/bin', '/usr/sbin'
> Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d .
> Purging c
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:57:25 +0200
David Baron wrote:
> Try reinstalling your kernel, or if you compiled your own, install a
> recent linux-image-2.6.32.5 from Sid. The postinstall script will
> point /etc/fstab and lilo.conf to the newer UUID references and then
> it should play.
>
> The postin
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:57:25 +0200
David Baron wrote:
> Try reinstalling your kernel, or if you compiled your own, install a
> recent linux-image-2.6.32.5 from Sid. The postinstall script will
> point /etc/fstab and lilo.conf to the newer UUID references and then
> it should play.
I'll give it a
Try reinstalling your kernel, or if you compiled your own, install a recent
linux-image-2.6.32.5 from Sid. The postinstall script will point /etc/fstab
and lilo.conf to the newer UUID references and then it should play.
The postinstall for home-brew kernels does not do this for you, I'm afraid a
In <4c9c2ca9.3020...@hardwarefreak.com>, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 9/23/2010 11:25 PM:
>>> No, that's normal. What had you changed on the system immediately
>>> prior to this boot problem occurring?
>>
>> apt-get dist-upgrade, natch.
>
>WTF is "natch"?
Shortening of "
bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 9/23/2010 11:25 PM:
>> No, that's normal. What had you changed on the system immediately
>> prior to this boot problem occurring?
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade, natch.
WTF is "natch"?
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:25:56 -0700
wrote:
> aaargh. I've never had so much trouble in my entire
> linux/debian/life. I have had a smooth boot or bootloader upgrade on
> this computer since I fired it up. other one works good, though. but
> really, 1/2 _is_ bad.
I have NOT had a smooth, etc..
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:20:45 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 9/23/2010 10:50 PM:
>
> > Boot image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64
> > Device 0x0802: BIOS drive 0x80, 255 heads, 30515 cylinders,
> >63 sectors. Partition offset: 120583890 sectors.
> > Usi
bri...@aracnet.com put forth on 9/23/2010 10:50 PM:
> Boot image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-amd64
> Device 0x0802: BIOS drive 0x80, 255 heads, 30515 cylinders,
>63 sectors. Partition offset: 120583890 sectors.
> Using Volume ID 5879D4A8 on bios 80
> Setup length is 27 sectors.
> Mappe
> In the past, I've always just booted Debian off of a floppy, but this time I
> want to use LILO to boot Debian or Win95 depending on what I want. If I
> want to use LILO, do I just choose 'Make bootable form hard disk' at the
> last step of Debian 2.1 Slink, or do I have to do something else.
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 12:51:30PM +0100, Thomas MANGIN wrote:
> As far as I noticed I didn t see any to to config lilo with a windows
> partition. I done it by hand few month ago but I needed and initrd file
> If I am right. On my actual installation which is lighter I don t get it
> any more. Wha
> As far as I noticed I didn t see any to to config lilo with a windows
> partition. I done it by hand few month ago but I needed and initrd file
> If I am right. On my actual installation which is lighter I don t get it
> any more. What can i do !!
>
> Thomas
Say again? It's kind of hard to und
26 matches
Mail list logo
