Re: libpam0g package bug ?

1999-10-14 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 05:53:34PM -0700, aphro wrote: > Is it just me or is there something wrong with t his picture: > > Unpacking replacement libpam0g ... > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libpam0g: > libpam0g depends on libpam0g-util (>= 0.65-0.9); however: > Package libp

Re: libpam0g

1998-02-06 Thread dpk
On 6 Feb 1998, James Troup wrote: > You don't need to use --force-depends. > > 15:09:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~/temp $sudo dpkg -iEG libpam0g_0.57b-0.deb > libpam0g-util_0.57b-0.deb > Selecting previously deselected package libpam0g. > (Reading database ... 30225 files and directories currently instal

Re: libpam0g

1998-02-06 Thread James Troup
dpk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] dpkg -s libpam0g > Package: libpam0g > [snip] > Depends: libc6, libpam0g-util (>= 0.57b-0) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] dpkg -s libpam0g-util > [snip] > Depends: libpam0g (>= 0.57b-0), libc6, libpwdb0g > > Is there a reason why these two package