Re: libdrm-intel from experimental

2009-01-08 Thread Jochen Schulz
Peter Jordan: > Jochen Schulz, Wed Jan 07 2009 23:18:04 GMT+0100 (CET): >> >> Unfortunately, I don't have the old version anymore and >> snaphots.debian.net doesn't list the package at all (it has probably >> never entered sid). > > If you could write the bug report and use amd64 I can mail you t

Re: libdrm-intel from experimental

2009-01-07 Thread Peter Jordan
Jochen Schulz, Wed Jan 07 2009 23:18:04 GMT+0100 (CET): > Hi, > > A few weeks ago I bought a shiny new Thinkpad X200. Thinkwiki.org > suggested to install X.Org from experimental and since I usually run sid > anyway I did so. Everything worked smoothly until a recent upgrade > installed libdrm-int

Re: libdrm-intel from experimental

2009-01-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Jochen Schulz wrote: > Eugene V. Lyubimkin: >> Jochen Schulz wrote: >>> A few weeks ago I bought a shiny new Thinkpad X200. Thinkwiki.org >>> suggested to install X.Org from experimental and since I usually run sid >>> anyway I did so. Everything worked smoothly until a recent upgrade >>> installed

Re: libdrm-intel from experimental

2009-01-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
Eugene V. Lyubimkin: > Jochen Schulz wrote: >> >> A few weeks ago I bought a shiny new Thinkpad X200. Thinkwiki.org >> suggested to install X.Org from experimental and since I usually run sid >> anyway I did so. Everything worked smoothly until a recent upgrade >> installed libdrm-intel1 version 2

Re: libdrm-intel from experimental

2009-01-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Jochen Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > A few weeks ago I bought a shiny new Thinkpad X200. Thinkwiki.org > suggested to install X.Org from experimental and since I usually run sid > anyway I did so. Everything worked smoothly until a recent upgrade > installed libdrm-intel1 version 2.4.3+git+20090105+a8c5