What if you roll your own kernel?
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 22:02 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> Here's the full output without the -f option. I don't think it's
> really making any difference.
>
> latitude:/home/andrew/Desktop# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
> Reading Package Lists... Don
Here's the full output without the -f option. I don't think it's
really making any difference.
latitude:/home/andrew/Desktop# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
cramfsprogs dash
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:26:29PM -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> I originally installed the "stable" distro because I didn't know any
> better and I've since upgraded to "testing". It's definately an x86;
> it's a PII laptop. I didn't realize I was using such an old kernel
> until I tried to inst
Wow...
Back to your question, though. What is "-f" masking? What happens
when you run plain old
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:26 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> I originally installed the "stable" distro because I didn't know any
> better and I've since upg
I originally installed the "stable" distro because I didn't know any
better and I've since upgraded to "testing". It's definately an x86;
it's a PII laptop. I didn't realize I was using such an old kernel
until I tried to install the linuxant wifi driver and it told me.
On 5/17/06, Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4 by running:
Jeezus, man, how old is your system?
By any chance, are you running a non-i386 system?
[snip]
>
> How can I get around this?
Kernel 2.2 is pretty darned ancient. Why not just
6 matches
Mail list logo
