On Monday 27 June 2005 09:33, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100,
>
> Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote:
> >> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the
> >> original mod_jk. The configuration for
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100,
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote:
>> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the
>> original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping
>> than with jk and thus is fell
On Friday 24 June 2005 01:12, Paul D. Bain wrote:
>
> I am not an expert on network security, but, IIRC, putting a web server
> on the same physical box as a firewall is an incredibly _bad_ idea, at
> least from a security point of view. Why? Well, if your web server is
> compromised (via th
Alan Chandler wrote:
I am trying to add tomcat4 into my existing apache2 system so that I can
experiment with java (in the form of servlets and jsp).
Although in reality I only have a single computer, for learning purposes I
want to similate the situation where I have potentially split web and
On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:19, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> I have docs to do that. It was on a redhat server, there shouldn't be
> any problems doing the same on debian. The only problem is that the doc
> is in french... can you read french?
No need - I am going with mod_jk - see other posts above
On Thursday 23 June 2005 22:11, Mark Lowe wrote:
> If you're up for compliling jk and for that matter apache then there's
> no problem using apache2 and jk.. But you'd lose the benefit of the
> package management that is a big plus with debian..
You misunderstand me - the link you gave below build
On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote:
> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the
> original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping
> than with jk and thus is fell out of favour..
Yes I know - thats why I was puzzled that even unstable does not
Alan Chandler wrote:
> I am trying to add tomcat4 into my existing apache2 system so that I can
> experiment with java (in the form of servlets and jsp).
>
> Although in reality I only have a single computer, for learning purposes I
> want to similate the situation where I have potentially split
I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the
original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping
than with jk and thus is fell out of favour..
Unfortunatly the apache2 modules for the debian distribution only has
a compiled jk2. Assuming you want to use the deba
9 matches
Mail list logo
