Re: ldap/pam problem

1999-06-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 05:53:07PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On 16 Jun 1999, Rob Browning wrote: > > > > > If so, then when I tried those modifications, I couldn't figure out > > how to get reasonable behavior. If you have > > > > auth sufficient pam_ldap.so > > auth r

Re: ldap/pam problem

1999-06-17 Thread Rob Browning
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I used this complex invokation, you'll need an appropriately bug-fixed pam > library (Ben, you have my patches..) That's nice. Thanks. That solves at least part of my problem, though I'm beginning to think that we may be better off cobbling up somet

Re: ldap/pam problem

1999-06-17 Thread Sergey V Kovalyov
> > If so, then when I tried those modifications, I couldn't figure out > > how to get reasonable behavior. If you have > > > > auth sufficient pam_ldap.so > > auth required pam_unix_auth.so try_first_pass > > > > then if the entry is found in ldap, pam returns and you never e

Re: ldap/pam problem

1999-06-16 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On 16 Jun 1999, Rob Browning wrote: > > If so, then when I tried those modifications, I couldn't figure out > how to get reasonable behavior. If you have > > auth sufficient pam_ldap.so > auth required pam_unix_auth.so try_first_pass > > then if the entry is found in ldap,