kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Luis Finotti wrote:
Thanks for the info. It seems nice and it's a good idea, but it made
the desktop switching a bit too slow... (...)
Only when kompose is launched for the first time, it takes some time
create the screenshots. The second time onwards it is very
Luis Finotti wrote:
Hi,
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I just discovered this great little program called kompose which is a
task manager for KDE. It just made my day! If you are a KDE user and
usually open a lot of windows while working, kompose is just for you.
Good bye Alt+Tab, Welcome Win+Tab
Hi,
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I just discovered this great little program called kompose which is a
task manager for KDE. It just made my day! If you are a KDE user and
usually open a lot of windows while working, kompose is just for you.
Good bye Alt+Tab, Welcome Win+Tab :-)
hth
raju
Th
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:24:51PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> and your L*.gz files are for your own "time stamping"
> and status checking ?
Something like that. It's just a flat list of the *.deb files in the
mirror /a/l, that's why it's called L*.gz ("list").
It's so I can tell what
hi ya william
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, William Ballard wrote:
> I looked at apt-move but I didn't want a http based mirror.
the local mirror can be anywhere but okay on not using httpd/ftp
> /a "this is all related to apt"
okay on the directory subtreee ... make it according to the scripts
> I c
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 07:37:37PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > /a/o/YYMMDD_HHNNSS/*.deb - the debs which were replaced at
>
> okay... i'm confused ... what does each subdir dor ??
Facilitates rollback, similar to snapshot.debian.net.
It goes like this:
apt-get update
aptitude upgrade
/a/u <--- s
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:08:25PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 07:37:37PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> /var/lib/cache into /home/httpd/local-deb-mirror ?
I looked at apt-move but I didn't want a http based mirror.
I access my via file protocol.
My scripts are a hack. I lik
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, William Ballard wrote:
> I've posted these a bunch:
>
> /a/l/*.deb - The set of .debs which is the "current" plus "new"
>dpkg-scanpackages is run on this
> /a/o/YYMMDD_HHNNSS/*.deb - the debs which were replaced at
>HH:NN:SS on MM/DD/20YY
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:52:29PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> By its very operation it writes only the latest, yes?
Yes, that's a built-in feature that comes for free,
and is the real magic. The rest is incidental.
>
> Then what exactly are those last 2 steps you mention?
I've posted these
William Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:56:53AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
True, but fitting it on one CD seems a problem with an existing system.
I am going to try building one from scratch to keep watch on the size.
I keep a local mirror of all the .debs I have installed.
I have a s
William Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:56:53AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
True, but fitting it on one CD seems a problem with an existing system.
I am going to try building one from scratch to keep watch on the size.
I keep a local mirror of all the .debs I have installed.
I have a s
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:56:53AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> True, but fitting it on one CD seems a problem with an existing system.
> I am going to try building one from scratch to keep watch on the size.
I keep a local mirror of all the .debs I have installed.
I have a script that moves /v
William Ballard wrote:
Boy, BootCD is one superslick package. Used it with a debootstrap
chroot. It just works, seriously.
I might finally be able to give my friends and family a LiveCD that will
entice them to switch. A Kernel that works just for them, Fluxbox,
Firefox, MPlayer, Java, OpenO
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Matthew Garman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote:
> > > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots
> > > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What
> > > has been very impressive is tha
See todays LWN weekly edition for more on emacs features
(http://www.lwn.net). I found the article quite informative (like most
of LWN's stuff).
Matthew Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does the new version of GNU emacs support *console mode* syntax
> highlighting (I guess it's called "font locking" in emacs-speak).
Yes.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
While having never invented a sin, I'm trying to pe
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote:
> > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots
> > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What
> > has been very impressive is that things just work. On previous major
> > upgrades (1
On approximately Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:28:09AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
> I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots
> of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What
> has been very impressive is that things just work. On previous major
> up
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:36:48PM -0500, DvB wrote:
> This may be taking this thread a little OT, but I have to ask... I've
> heard (on Slashdot, to be exact) that Emacs21 has some "new user
> oriented" features that can be annoying for more experienced users. What
> are they? (assuming there rea
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:36:48PM -0500, DvB wrote:
> This may be taking this thread a little OT, but I have to ask... I've
> heard (on Slashdot, to be exact) that Emacs21 has some "new user
> oriented" features that can be annoying for more experienced users. What
> are they? (assuming there real
Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And no bugs that affected me -- I am impressed! Of course, upstream
> work is also great - I use so many .el files that I expected a few of
> them to break, but everything is fine!
>
This may be taking this thread a little OT, but I have to ask..
:: S Salman Ahmed writes:
> Let me second that. Being an XEmacs user, I wanted to see what Emacs21
> was all about, and was planning to install from sources. I was
> pleasantly surprised to see Emacs21 made it into sid so quickly.
> Good job!!
And no bugs that affected me -- I am impressed! Of c
22 matches
Mail list logo
