Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread csj
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 09:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:39:54PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote: > I tried the testing version of kmail, unfortunately it was unable to > read properly my mailboxes. In other words, that version fails to > display message listings properl

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread list3
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:16:28PM +1000, Peter Good wrote: > As being on holidays for the last week or so, can everyone tell me what the > fuss is with kmail?? And what bugs everyone has been strikin, seems to be > working here fine, with 2.2.2-6 installed. I'm having the signal 4 error describ

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread list3
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:39:54PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote: I tried the testing version of kmail, unfortunately it was unable to read properly my mailboxes. In other words, that version fails to display message listings properly. I really need 2.2.2-4 version. Versions 2.1 and bellow are too old

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread Peter Good
As being on holidays for the last week or so, can everyone tell me what the fuss is with kmail?? And what bugs everyone has been strikin, seems to be working here fine, with 2.2.2-6 installed. Peter. On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 22:39, Hans Ekbrand wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EM

Re: kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb

2001-12-19 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:07:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. > > I'm in a desparate need of kmail_2.2.2-4_i386.deb > Anyone has it ? > I checked the ftp/http sites and there are previous versions. > > Both 2.2.2-5 and 2.2.2-6 have bugs which prevent me from running kmail. > I do