Hilary Snaden wrote:
...
> What change in 5.9 (perhaps 5.8) may be caused the machine to freeze,
> and can it be fixed?
p.s. use the command reportbug as it will give more
relevant information that will help. :)
songbird
Dan Ritter wrote:
...
> Could be anything. You are running the unstable version of
> Debian.
>
> You should report it to the Debian kernel maintainers:
> Debian Kernel Team
*nods*
will be very important to know the type of the
processor and laptop, it may be one of the peripheral
interface
Hilary Snaden wrote:
> Description: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid
>
> After a recent kernel update, my previously very stable laptop developed
> major problems. After a period usually of about 12 hours (once after only 2
> hours, once after about 36), the machine froze, requiring a hard power
>
David Wright wrote:
> That's right: deloptes claim was mistaken, which I pointed out
> because errors of fact need correcting.
> I didn't mean to mystify you (or anybody else).
Sorry I agree with you, I also learned something, thanks.
On Thu 11 Jan 2018 at 15:35:36 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
> David Wright composed on 2018-01-11 12:52 (UTC-0600):
>
> > On Wed 10 Jan 2018 at 19:48:57 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> deloptes composed on 2018-01-11 01:12 (UTC+0100):
>
> >> > David Wright wrote:
>
> >> >>> It seemed to insta
David Wright composed on 2018-01-11 12:52 (UTC-0600):
> On Wed 10 Jan 2018 at 19:48:57 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
>> deloptes composed on 2018-01-11 01:12 (UTC+0100):
>> > David Wright wrote:
>> >>> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
>> >>> image files, etc
On Wed 10 Jan 2018 at 19:48:57 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
> deloptes composed on 2018-01-11 01:12 (UTC+0100):
>
> > David Wright wrote:
>
> >>> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
> >>> image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now the system
>
On 01/06/2018 06:58 PM, Rob Hurle wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running Stretch and yesterday I did my normal:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now the system
won't
deloptes composed on 2018-01-11 01:12 (UTC+0100):
> David Wright wrote:
>>> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
>>> image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now the system
>> ↑↑↑ really? It's a different package so
>> it should install
David Wright wrote:
>> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
>> image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now the system
>
> ↑↑↑ really? It's a different package so
> it should install alongside the old one.
no, this is one and the same pa
On 2018-01-10 16:58 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> In the case of stable Debian release kernel versioning at least, the .0 in
> both
> seem to be entirely superfluous. Does any other integer ever appear in place
> of
> that 0?
No. The trailing .0 is only there to appease programs that do not work
David Wright composed on 2018-01-10 15:12 (UTC-0600):
> On Tue 09 Jan 2018 at 18:18:27 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Here's a portion of /boot/ on one I just updated minutes ago:
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 26 Jan 9 17:47 initrd -> initrd.img-4.9.0-5-686-pae
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 26 Jan 9 17:47 i
On Tue 09 Jan 2018 at 18:18:27 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
> Here's a portion of /boot/ on one I just updated minutes ago:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 26 Jan 9 17:47 initrd -> initrd.img-4.9.0-5-686-pae
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 26 Jan 9 17:47 initrd-cur -> initrd.img-4.9.0-5-686-pae
> -rw-r--r-- 1 17
On Sun 07 Jan 2018 at 13:58:25 (+1100), Rob Hurle wrote:
> I'm running Stretch and yesterday I did my normal:
>
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get upgrade
>
> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
> image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now
Rob Hurle composed on 2018-01-07 13:58 (UTC+1100):
> I'm running Stretch and yesterday I did my normal:
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get upgrade
> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
> image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now the syst
On 08/01/2018 15:59, Anton Gorlov wrote:
Hi.
Less /usr/share/doc/linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64/changelog.Debian.gz
- x86/mm: Add the 'nopcid' boot option to turn off PCID
...
- kaiser: add "nokaiser" boot option, using ALTERNATIVE
In debian kernel no option *pti*
08.01.2018 07:14, Rob Hurle пишет:
Hi.
Less /usr/share/doc/linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64/changelog.Debian.gz
- x86/mm: Add the 'nopcid' boot option to turn off PCID
...
- kaiser: add "nokaiser" boot option, using ALTERNATIVE
In debian kernel no option *pti*
08.01.2018 07:14, Rob Hurle пишет:
Thanks to everyone who provided help with
Thanks to everyone who provided help with this failure of the
4.9.0-5-686-pae kernel. I have tried both "nopti" and "pti=off" kernel
parameters to see if it is the fix for "Meltdown" which is causing the
problem, but neither parameter changes anything. Since the system doesn't
even get to the kern
On 07/01/2018 21:27, Marc Auslander wrote:
The new kernel implements the "fix" for meltdown. You could try booting
with the fix turned off - I believe the kernel parameter is pti=off
Rob Hurle writes:
Hi All,
I'm running Stretch and yesterday I did my normal:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-ge
The new kernel implements the "fix" for meltdown. You could try booting
with the fix turned off - I believe the kernel parameter is pti=off
Rob Hurle writes:
>Hi All,
>
>I'm running Stretch and yesterday I did my normal:
>
>sudo apt-get update
>sudo apt-get upgrade
>
>It seemed to install vmlinu
On 2018-01-07 13:58 +1100, Rob Hurle wrote:
> I'm running Stretch and yesterday I did my normal:
>
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get upgrade
>
> It seemed to install vmlinuz-4.9.0-5-686-pae (and associated config and
> image files, etc) in place of 4.9.0-4-686-pae versions. Now the system
>
Russell Shaw schrieb:
Kevin Boergens wrote:
Hi!
I've got a nasty problem with my kernel (2.4.18-bf2.4) on Woody
I discussed a long time about it in de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware,
but no solution was found, maybe someone over here can help, it looks
like a Debian problem:
My southbridge is a N
Kevin Boergens wrote:
Hi!
I've got a nasty problem with my kernel (2.4.18-bf2.4) on Woody
I discussed a long time about it in de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware, but
no solution was found, maybe someone over here can help, it looks like a
Debian problem:
My southbridge is a National Semiconductor C
Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
BTW: i have tried to compile a module version of the bcm4400 driver for the
2.4.20-bf24-xfs kernel but when i send data to the netowork i get a kernel
panic.
cheer,
Raffaele
Hi Raffaele,
i had no real problems getting my broadcom-card running. I took the
kernel-sources
Lasse said:
>
> Hello
> Making a long story short. Im installing debian by the pxe feature. The
> kernel beeing used during the installation boots ut the system
> correctly.
> But after installing i can't make the system boot on installed kernel.
> It's hard to pinpoint the problem, and really need
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:51:41AM +1100, Steve Kieu wrote:
> philip baratta wrote:
> > I have obtained the 2.4.3 kernel, added the indicated options under
> > USB support. However, when I try to make zImage, the last few lines
> > of the output are:
> > net/network.o(.data+0x57c4): undefined refer
> I have obtained the 2.4.3 kernel, added the
> indicated options
> under USB support. However, when I try to make
> zImage, the last
> few lines of the output are:
>
> net/network.o(.data+0x57c4): undefined reference to
> `sysctl_ipx_pprop_broadcasti
> ng'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
So if
> > If you are running woody, downgrade the binutils
> > package will solve this problem
> >
> >
> I'm running potato. Does that mean I cannot do this?
Nope, so it is not the problem with binutils, as in
potato still uses the old version of binutils. Newer
version of binutils having some problem
> I have been trying to set up a usb scanner under debian. To that
>
> net/network.o(.data+0x57c4): undefined reference to
> `sysctl_ipx_pprop_broadcasti
> ng'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
while i haven't used 2.4.x yet the troubleshooting
i'd use would be about the same. from the looks of
the
philip baratta wrote:
>
> I have been trying to set up a usb scanner under debian. To that
> end I have been following the Linux USB Scanner mini-howto.
>
> I have obtained the 2.4.3 kernel, added the indicated options
> under USB support. However, when I try to make zImage, the last
> few lines
> I have obtained the 2.4.3 kernel, added the
> indicated options
> under USB support. However, when I try to make
> zImage, the last
> few lines of the output are:
If you are running woody, downgrade the binutils
package will solve this problem
> net/network.o(.data+0x57c4): undefined refere
> Hi everybody,
> I'm encountering a very weird problem (or it seems weirdish to me). I
> built kernel with support for couple file systems and sound.
> When I try to mount a CD or play music on the super user account,
> everything work fine. But when I try to do the same with ordinary user
> ac
Add yourself to group audo and group cdrom.
scud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hi everybody,
: I'm encountering a very weird problem (or it seems weirdish to me). I
: built kernel with support for couple file systems and sound.
: When I try to mount a CD or play music on the super user account
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:04:52AM +0300, Petteri Heinonen wrote
> I compiled kernel succesfully, but when I try to boot with it,
> it says:
> Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
>
> Have I left something important out of my kernel or what is
> going on?
>
Probably,
Jay Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>_wstrict-prototypes -02 -fomit-frame-pointer -DLOCALE -DCURSES_LOC="h>" -c -o lxdialog.o lxdialog.c
>In file included from lxdialog.c:22:
>dialog.h:29: curses.h: No such file or directory
[snip]
>So what is this telling me and what am I doing wrong?
It's t
Shao Zhang wrote :
> However, top reports there are heaps of memory left.
>
> 4:03pm up 40 days, 21:53, 15 users, load average: 0.40, 0.42, 0.36
> 217 processes: 216 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states: 7.6% user, 6.7% system, 0.0% nice,
36 matches
Mail list logo
