Re: kernel is using 50M of memory

brian moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 12:44:27PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I was looking at the memory usage (gmemusage, and /proc/meminfo), > > and I was noticing that 'linux' was using nearly 50m of memory. I > > was rather disturbed, and wonde

Re: kernel is using 50M of memory

brian moore wrote: > From here, I can, with the knowledge that the machine has 256M of RAM, > figure out the kernel usage: couldn't you look at the kernel log: Memory: 517152k/524288k available (1256k kernel code, 412k reserved, 5424k data, 44k init) in this case 1256k is the kernel? nate --

Re: kernel is using 50M of memory

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:26:48PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote: > On approximately Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:53:42AM -0800, brian moore wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 12:44:27PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > I was looking at the memory usage (gmemusage, and /proc/meminfo),

Re: kernel is using 50M of memory

On approximately Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:53:42AM -0800, brian moore wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 12:44:27PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I was looking at the memory usage (gmemusage, and /proc/meminfo), > > and I was noticing that 'linux' was using nearly 50m of memory. I >

Re: kernel is using 50M of memory

brian moore wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 12:44:27PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I was looking at the memory usage (gmemusage, and /proc/meminfo), > > and I was noticing that 'linux' was using nearly 50m of memory. I > > was rather disturbed, and wondering why > > Um, /p

Re: kernel is using 50M of memory

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 12:44:27PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote: > Hey, > > I was looking at the memory usage (gmemusage, and /proc/meminfo), > and I was noticing that 'linux' was using nearly 50m of memory. I > was rather disturbed, and wondering why Um, /proc/meminfo doesn't say how much the