Re: Kernel Header Files

1999-08-10 Thread Julian Stoev
Hi! /usr/include/* are part of libc package. AFAIK you have to upgrade libc to have newer /usr/include/* I had the same problem several days ago and asked here if it is safe to upgrade to libc-2.1 from potato to have 2.2 kernel headers. The answers were, that in general with standard Debian softwar

Re: kernel header files

1996-06-12 Thread Rob Browning
Lawrence Chim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it necessary to install lib5-dev in order to compile programs. Yes > I don't know why there is a libc5-dev. If I install a new kernel, > it comes with its only kernel headers. Install libc5-dev and read /usr/doc/libc5-dev/FAQ.gz. > Also, if I in

Re: kernel header files

1996-06-12 Thread J.H.M.Dassen
> I don't know why there is a libc5-dev. If I install a new kernel, > it comes with its only kernel headers. Is it necessary to install > lib5-dev in order to compile programs. Yes. The kernel headers are not enough to compile even a normal "Hello, world!" program. etc are libc headers, and ar

Re: kernel header files

1996-06-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Lawrence" == Lawrence Chim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lawrence> I don't know why there is a libc5-dev. This provides all kinds of libraries in /usr/lib/* and headers in /usr/include; without which it is impossible to compile any program. Lawrence> If I install a new kernel, it