On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 11:04:21AM -0500, Person, Roderick wrote:
> What FF is the larges size a Kernel can be to get mounted!! My smallest
> kernel so far is 808,536 in size. My largest was over a Meg. Help ! All I
> maked was to hear Window Maker! That's all
Try installing the kernel-packag
What are you putting in that kernel?
I have my 2.0.34 compiled with vfat/dos/iso9660 support, SB16, some other
options, and it's 360K only, in the bzImage format.
GO through the kernel and unmark all the stuff you don't need.
I think the kernel size limitation is in the docs. If my memory serves m
Justin Akehurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Person, Roderick wrote:
|
| > Ok,
| >
| > I finally got a kernel to compile!! Now, it telling me it too large to
| > mount!!! So I remade it, making as much stuff as possible as modules. Still
| > too large. So I tried to make bzI
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Person, Roderick wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I finally got a kernel to compile!! Now, it telling me it too large to
> mount!!! So I remade it, making as much stuff as possible as modules. Still
> too large. So I tried to make bzImage - STILL TOO LARGE!!
>
> What FF is the larges si
On Sun, 9 Aug 1998, Alan Su wrote:
> just out of curiousity, if i do 'make clean ; make zImage' in
> /usr/src/linux repeatedly and compare the size of
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/zImage, should i expect to get the same
> size image?
pass :)
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 46 Aug 8
On Sun, Aug 09, 1998 at 01:00:46AM -0700, Alan Su wrote:
> just out of curiousity, if i do 'make clean ; make zImage' in
> /usr/src/linux repeatedly and compare the size of
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/zImage, should i expect to get the same
> size image?
>
> i'm currently burning in a computer
6 matches
Mail list logo
