Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-02 Thread Frank Gevaerts
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:05:09PM +1000, Paul Foote wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:24:04AM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > > Because that's what the kernel developers WANTED to do. Why favor GTK over > > Qt? > > Namely linus, hes a KDE lover aparently :( > What surprises me is they didnt stick

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:19:21PM +, Robin Gerard wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:38:54PM +0200, Torquil Macdonald S?rensen wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:17, Robin Gerard wrote: > > > From curiosity, what package I must install, in order that xconfig > > > works fine ? (libqt2 or l

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-02 Thread Paul Foote
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:24:04AM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > Because that's what the kernel developers WANTED to do. Why favor GTK over > Qt? Namely linus, hes a KDE lover aparently :( What surprises me is they didnt stick with Tk! -- /--\ | Paul Foote by day,

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-02 Thread Marcin M. Bis
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:17:44 + Robin Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > Why to use Qt rather Gtk ? > -- > Gerard Read the output of 'make help'. And then try 'make gconfig' (you'll need gtk2.0). I haven't tried it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-02 Thread David Z Maze
Robin Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (I prefer Gtk because it is free, wehreas Qt ? Got over their licensing issues a long time ago. Looking in /usr/share/doc/kdebase-bin/copyright, the various bits of KDE are under differing DFSG-free licenses. > And, when I used Mandrake with an old ma

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-02 Thread Robin Gerard
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:38:54PM +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:17, Robin Gerard wrote: ... > > From curiosity, what package I must install, in order that xconfig works > > fine ? (libqt2 or libqt3 are not suitable) > > Why to use Qt rather Gtk ? > > libqt3

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-01 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:17:44AM +, Robin Gerard wrote: > menuconfig works fine with kernel 2.5.xxx, but xconfig needs Qt. > Why to use Qt rather Gtk ? Because that's what the kernel developers WANTED to do. Why favor GTK over Qt? -- Marc Wilson | problem drinker, n.: A man who never

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-01 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:17, Robin Gerard wrote: > Hello, > menuconfig works fine with kernel 2.5.xxx, but xconfig needs Qt. > From curiosity, what package I must install, in order that xconfig works > fine ? (libqt2 or libqt3 are not suitable) > Why to use Qt rather Gtk ? libqt3-mt-dev make gc

Re: kernel 2.5.xx and Qt

2003-07-01 Thread David Z Maze
Robin Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > menuconfig works fine with kernel 2.5.xxx, but xconfig needs Qt. > From curiosity, what package I must install, in order that xconfig > works fine ? (libqt2 or libqt3 are not suitable) Why to use Qt > rather Gtk ? My impression from this list is that th