On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:29:36AM -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
> I have a 486 firewall myself. My connectivity on other machines more or less
> stops when I do things like run dpkg or the gShield firewall script
> (iptables) loads on it. Is this normal, or is it just my particular 486 33?
dpkg
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 15:59, dman wrote:
> Add 'devfs=mount' to your kernel command line and try again. Use the
> old-dev name for the root= argument though.
I'm getting there...
devfsd starts and hangs on "Creating extra device nodes...".
Looking at the script:
for i in `sed -e '/^#/d' $DEVFI
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:46:36AM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
| Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Brian Nelson wrote:
[...]
| > I have not found any reason to prefer make-kpkg over "make bzImage" and
| > manually installing the kernel image.
Just to be different :
| 1. You won't forg
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:29:36AM -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
| On Sunday 09 September 2001 01:07 am, Nathan E Norman wrote:
| > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
| > > Nathan E Norman wrote:
|
| >
| > I maintain (more or less) four boxes ... a celeron (my home machine
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 15:59, dman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:05:33AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> | Yes, it's me again.
> |
> | Once this is sorted I'll stop bugging you, I promise!
> |
> | Does the kernel-image for 2.4.x from unstable come with devfsd on? I
>
Am 08. Sep, 2001 schwäzte Craig Dickson so:
> I have not found any reason to prefer make-kpkg over "make bzImage" and
> manually installing the kernel image.
I've adminned many boxen with almost the same configuration. Also, my
firewall has no developer tools. kpkg actually doesn't help me much t
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Yeah, those mysterious Debian developers do strange things to the
> source. Whatever could it be?
Now you're just being snide, which doesn't exactly contribute to the
civility factor of the discussion. Fortunately, I have better sense than
to respond in kind.
The point is,
Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > > Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
> > > kernel-package :)
> >
> > You mean, once I manage more than one machine that will run exactly
On Sunday 09 September 2001 01:07 am, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> I maintain (more or less) four boxes ... a celeron (my home machine),
> an athlon (my work desktop), a 486 (my firewall), and a p90 (a server
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> > Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
> > kernel-package :)
>
> You mean, once I manage more than one machine that will run exactly the
> same kernel. Right now, I have t
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> > Why not just download the kernel-source package? Similar to the
> > vanilla ones, but usually with a few patches applied.
>
> That's exactly why not. I'd rather have a vanilla Linus kernel source
> tree to which I can apply p
Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
> kernel-package :)
You mean, once I manage more than one machine that will run exactly the
same kernel. Right now, I have two Debian boxes, but one is a P3 running
Sid (kernel 2.4.9) and the other is
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 01:55:41PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> I have not found any reason to prefer make-kpkg over "make bzImage" and
Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
kernel-package :)
--
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Microm
On Saturday 08 September 2001 04:55 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> > The package
> > installs the bzip2'ed source in /usr/src. Just tar -jxf it, configure
> > with 'make menuconfig' or whatever, and then build a custom
> > kernel-image package with 'make-kpkg kernel_image'.
>
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 01:55:41PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> > Why not just download the kernel-source package? Similar to the
> > vanilla ones, but usually with a few patches applied.
>
> That's exactly why not. I'd rather have a vanilla Linus kernel source
> tree to
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Why not just download the kernel-source package? Similar to the
> vanilla ones, but usually with a few patches applied.
That's exactly why not. I'd rather have a vanilla Linus kernel source
tree to which I can apply patches without worrying about whether they'll
conflict wi
John Toon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 08 September 2001 10:05 am, Ross Burton wrote:
>
> Personally I would always recommend downloading yourself a vanilla 2.4.x
> kernel tarball from http://www.kernel.org. With kernels, this is one of the
> few areas where I think it is better to
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:05:33AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
| Yes, it's me again.
|
| Once this is sorted I'll stop bugging you, I promise!
|
| Does the kernel-image for 2.4.x from unstable come with devfsd on? I
^
devfsd and devfs
On Saturday 08 September 2001 10:05 am, Ross Burton wrote:
> Yes, it's me again.
>
> Once this is sorted I'll stop bugging you, I promise!
>
> Does the kernel-image for 2.4.x from unstable come with devfsd on? I
> tried mounting a zip disk (external ppa) and the device was
> /dev/scsi/0/... not /
19 matches
Mail list logo
