Re: kernel 2.4.20 dma problem

2003-03-27 Thread Tom Allison
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Tom Allison wrote: Yes, I think it is. See below Does that mean I'm in trouble? For me (I have a slightly different motherboard but the same VT82C686 South bridge) it meant massive data corruption until I switched off DMA. However the 2.4.21pre6 chan

Re: kernel 2.4.20 dma problem

2003-03-26 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Tom Allison wrote: > > Yes, I think it is. See below > Does that mean I'm in trouble? For me (I have a slightly different motherboard but the same VT82C686 South bridge) it meant massive data corruption until I switched off DMA. However the 2.4.21pre6 changelog contains the

Re: kernel 2.4.20 dma problem

2003-03-26 Thread Tom Allison
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Tom Allison wrote: Unless there is something that I'm missing, I think that this is a real bug in the kernel-image for the K7 build. Let me guess your motherboard has a VIA chipset? Yes, I think it is. See below Does that mean I'm in trouble? --

Re: kernel 2.4.20 dma problem

2003-03-26 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Tom Allison wrote: > Unless there is something that I'm missing, I think that this is a real bug > in the kernel-image for the K7 build. Let me guess your motherboard has a VIA chipset? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debia