On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:53:44 -0400
Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At last!
> Not only am I not inebriated, but I remembered where I read what I
> based my missive on. :-)
>
> http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/man/README/README.ATAPI
>
> An extract from which goes as follows:
>
Joris Huizer wrote:
Greg wrote:
which device do you write to ?
(there's a reason I ask, I'll elucidate when sober...^hic)};)
I call cdrecord as follows:
cdrecord --force dev=ATA:1,0,0
that means, the ATA:1,0,0 device
hmm, as I think of that, I guess that's a scsi naming scheme; I think I
Greg wrote:
which device do you write to ?
(there's a reason I ask, I'll elucidate when sober...^hic)};)
I call cdrecord as follows:
cdrecord --force dev=ATA:1,0,0
that means, the ATA:1,0,0 device
hmm, as I think of that, I guess that's a scsi naming scheme; I think I
read writing to /dev/
Joris Huizer wrote:
Greg wrote:
Seeker5528 wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:17:50 -0400
> Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>Don't you think it would be more confusing to tell people that SCSI
>>>emulation was built in to ide-cd. If you tell them that then they
will
>>>be expecting
Greg wrote:
Seeker5528 wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:17:50 -0400
> Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>Don't you think it would be more confusing to tell people that SCSI
>>>emulation was built in to ide-cd. If you tell them that then they will
>>>be expecting to have srX devices for
Seeker5528 wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:17:50 -0400
> Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>Don't you think it would be more confusing to tell people that SCSI
>>>emulation was built in to ide-cd. If you tell them that then they will
>>>be expecting to have srX devices for their drives
>>
>>1)
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:17:50 -0400
Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't you think it would be more confusing to tell people that SCSI
> > emulation was built in to ide-cd. If you tell them that then they will
> > be expecting to have srX devices for their drives
>
> 1) I have symlinks:
> [EM
Seeker5528 wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:32:17 -0400
Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My experience, FWIW, Simply put:
In kernel 2.4, ide-scsi module, we got used to the scsi-emulation concept.
Whereas,
In kernel 2.6, we were (somewhat confusingly, IMO) told the above, i.e.:
"SCSI emulation
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:32:17 -0400
Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My experience, FWIW, Simply put:
>
> In kernel 2.4, ide-scsi module, we got used to the scsi-emulation concept.
>
> Whereas,
>
> In kernel 2.6, we were (somewhat confusingly, IMO) told the above, i.e.:
> "SCSI emulation is no
On Thursday, 5 January 2006 at 16:32:17 -0400, Greg wrote:
> >
>
>
> My experience, FWIW, Simply put:
>
> In kernel 2.4, ide-scsi module, we got used to the scsi-emulation concept.
>
> Whereas,
>
> In kernel 2.6, we were (somewhat confusingly, IMO) told the above, i.e.:
> "SCSI emulation is
Richard Lyons wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2005 at 21:55:27 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:
On Friday 30 December 2005 09:24, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2005 at 22:12:26 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:
[...]
SCSI emulation is not required
On Friday, 30 December 2005 at 21:55:27 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 09:24, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 29 December 2005 at 22:12:26 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:
> > [...]
> >> SCSI emulation is not required in v2.6.
On Friday 30 December 2005 09:24, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 December 2005 at 22:12:26 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:
> [...]
>> SCSI emulation is not required in v2.6.
>
> I keep reading this, but xcdroast and so on still complain every time
> th
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:24:07PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> I keep reading this, but xcdroast and so on still complain every time
> that I should use SCSI emulation even though the kernel is 2.6.x. Is
> some other adjustment or setting needed instead?
In the past, people on this list have s
On Thursday, 29 December 2005 at 22:12:26 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:
[...]
> SCSI emulation is not required in v2.6.
I keep reading this, but xcdroast and so on still complain every time
that I should use SCSI emulation even though the kernel is 2.6.x. Is
some other adjustment or setting needed
Jules Dubois wrote:
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:56, Chinook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
For current stable kernel 2.4.27 it gives instructions on how to setup
an ATAPI CD-RW/DVD+-RW recorder on Debian. Trouble is they include lilo
and I'm using grub. Then below it say
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:56, Chinook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> For current stable kernel 2.4.27 it gives instructions on how to setup
> an ATAPI CD-RW/DVD+-RW recorder on Debian. Trouble is they include lilo
> and I'm using grub. Then below it says (I think) that
17 matches
Mail list logo
