On Monday 30 June 2003 01:57 pm, Andre Berger wrote:
> I'm trying to compile a 2.4.21 kernel on my woody system. I apt-got
> -b kernel-source-2.4.21 and installed all resulting .deb files.
> However when I cd to the source directory
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.21-2.4.21 and do "make-kpkg clean
> ;
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-07-01 10:16 -0400:
> * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030701 10:13]:
> > I'm trying to compile a 2.4.21 kernel on my w
HTH
-Original Message-
From: Manoj Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:23 PM
To: Detelin Batchovski
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#195031: kernel-package
Hi,
There seems to be a mismatch somewhere:
---
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030701 10:13]:
> I'm trying to compile a 2.4.21 kernel on my woody system. I apt-got
> -b kernel-source-2.4.21 and installed all resulting .deb files.
Hmm this is a little strange. What _exactly_ did you do?
Normally the steps would be something like:
sudo apt
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:52:07AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:43:41PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> > How? If you don't use the .config from a kernel-image-foo package
> > already in Debian (in which case you might as well just use the
> > kernel-image-foo package itself) t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:43:41PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> How? If you don't use the .config from a kernel-image-foo package
> already in Debian (in which case you might as well just use the
> kernel-image-foo package itself) then any pre-compiled mo
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 11:21:55PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> > Honestly, is there any advantage on that kernel compared to the one you get
> > from www.kernel.org and compile the clasic way, other than a slight ease of
> > ins
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:10 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian?
>
> Honestly, is there any advantage on that k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> Honestly, is there any advantage on that kernel compared to the one you get
> from www.kernel.org and compile the clasic way, other than a slight ease of
> installation.
Yes. You a
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:53:10PM +0200, Marino Fernandez wrote:
} On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:10 am, Colin Watson wrote:
} > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
} > > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian?
} >
} Honestly, is there any advantage on that
On Sunday 22 June 2003 11:10 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian?
>
Honestly, is there any advantage on that kernel compared to the one you get
from www.kernel.org and compile the clas
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Anybody know what the holdup is for 2.4.21 hitting Debian?
It's been in the incoming queue waiting for ftpmaster approval for five
days. A week is usually nothing to worry about in that queue.
--
Colin Watson
12 matches
Mail list logo
