On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:10:38AM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 03:28, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > > >That's due to the fact that this kernel is precompiled in the package,
> > > >and
> > > >2.95.4 was the version used by the maintainer.
> > > >
> > >
> > > But shouldn't it be
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 03:28, Rob Weir wrote:
> > >That's due to the fact that this kernel is precompiled in the package,
> > >and
> > >2.95.4 was the version used by the maintainer.
> > >
> >
> > But shouldn't it be compiled with gcc 3.2?
>
> Well, ideally, but it was built on (presumably) Herb
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:22:50PM +0200, Mpiktas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2. Today I
> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version shows
>
> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002
> (Debi
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:23:48PM +0200, Mpiktas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2.
> >Today I
> >> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version
> >shows
> >>
> >> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4
>
Hi,
> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2.
Today I
> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version
shows
>
> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4
20011002
> (Debian prerelease)) #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003
That's due to th
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Mpiktas wrote:
> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2. Today I
> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version shows
>
> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002
> (Debian prerelease)) #1 Tue Jan 14 00:
6 matches
Mail list logo