On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 09:44:48AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:28:44PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > I would venture to say that only 'apt-get source' is useful. 'apt-get
> > install' doesn't offer anything 'aptitude install' offers. In fact, if
> > you use aptitude, yo
Katipo wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Once you start using aptitude, it is depreciated to use
apt-get for installing packages since you lose the
benefits of aptitude tracking automatic dependencies.
What's pgrn?
It's prgn.
Sorry.
I meant to include
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> >
> >I would venture to say that only 'apt-get source' is useful.
>
> Don't forget 'apt-get build-dep' and 'apt-get moo'...
Try all this :)
$ aptitude moo
$ aptitude -v moo
$ aptitude -vv moo
$ aptitude -vvv
Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>>Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Once you start using aptitude, it is depreciated to use
>>>apt-get for installing packages since you lose the
>>>benefits of aptitude tracking automatic dependencies.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>What's
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:52:24AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Once you start using aptitude, it is depreciated to use
> > apt-get for installing packages since you lose the
> > benefits of aptitude tracking automatic dependencies.
>
> What's pgrn?
T
Paul Johnson wrote:
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Once you start using aptitude, it is depreciated to use
apt-get for installing packages since you lose the
benefits of aptitude tracking automatic dependencies.
What's pgrn?
It's prgn.
Regards,
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Once you start using aptitude, it is depreciated to use
> apt-get for installing packages since you lose the
> benefits of aptitude tracking automatic dependencies.
What's pgrn?
--
Paul Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:28:44PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 07:35:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> >> > >
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:56:44PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > . no way to install and remove packages simultaneously (you
> > must run apt-get at least twice)
Not true:
apt-get remove --purge program1 program2+
will purge program1 and install program2
I believe t
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:56:44PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 12:52:44PM +0200, Martin Kuball wrote:
> | Would you like to explain this a little bit? What exactly is the
> | advantage of using a front end over plain apt-get. At least I did not
> | encounter any
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
I'm sure this list isn't exhaustive, but it gives an idea why it is
recommended to use a program intended for end-user (admin) use such as
aptitude instead of a development proof-of-concept program (which is
what 'apt-get' and 'apt-cache' are).
And to anyone who hasn't
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 12:52:44PM +0200, Martin Kuball wrote:
| Am Friday 02 April 2004 22:46 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
| >
| > Don't use apt-get for serious administration;
| > apt-get install is useful, but for the rest you should use
| > real front-ends such as dselect and
| > aptitude.
|
| Would y
Brian Nelson wrote:
I would venture to say that only 'apt-get source' is useful.
Don't forget 'apt-get build-dep' and 'apt-get moo'...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am Friday 02 April 2004 22:46 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
>
> Don't use apt-get for serious administration;
> apt-get install is useful, but for the rest you should use
> real front-ends such as dselect and
> aptitude.
Would you like to explain this a little bit? What exactly is the
advantage of using a
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 07:35:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> > > Anyway, it seems no tool keeps users alert that some of their
>> > > packa
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 07:35:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > Anyway, it seems no tool keeps users alert that some of their
> > > packages are "no longer". Perhaps it should appear
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Anyway, it seems no tool keeps users alert that some of their
> > packages are "no longer". Perhaps it should appear when one does
> > dist-upgrades, or maybe a deb orphan-like tool that
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Anyway, it seems no tool keeps users alert that some of their packages
> are "no longer". Perhaps it should appear when one does
> dist-upgrades, or maybe a deb orphan-like tool that one could run from crontab.
You mean like dselect?
--- Obsolete a
18 matches
Mail list logo
