RE: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-29 Thread aphro
o: William T Wilson > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, William T Wilson wrote: > > > DPT raid controller drivers, I know, are distributed in source form. I > > cannot think of any reason t

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-28 Thread Peter Ross
On 28-Oct-1999, Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "PR" == Peter Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PR> Yes it does, but it lacks some of the advanced features of apt. > > What advanced features of apt are you referring to ?? > Some of the points I listed at the start of the emai

RE: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-28 Thread Adam Greene
ECTED] Sent: October 27, 1999 3:16 PM To: William T Wilson Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, William T Wilson wrote: > DPT raid controller drivers, I know, are distributed in source form. I > cannot think of any reason they

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-28 Thread Peter Ross
On 27-Oct-1999, aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have yet to even touch apt ..whats so good about it ?? > You can mix and match the locations where you get the .debs from (including multiple CDs), and it will automatically pick up the latest version. You don't have to use dselect, you can do

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-28 Thread aphro
i have yet to even touch apt ..whats so good about it ?? i always have used dftp to update my stuff ..works great. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-28 Thread Bart Szyszka
> It is called update-agent. It can do almost the same things as apt can do. > The main difference is that you can only get updates from > priority.redhat.com, > while apt can get them from any mirror. Update-agent for rh6.1 only runs in > an > X session. I'd take debian apt-get any day. Isn

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread Jacob Schmude
It is called update-agent. It can do almost the same things as apt can do. The main difference is that you can only get updates from priority.redhat.com, while apt can get them from any mirror. Update-agent for rh6.1 only runs in an X session. I'd take debian apt-get any day. Peter Ross writes

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread Peter Ross
On 27-Oct-1999, Bart Szyszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * apt (the tool to keep your distribution up to date), it is by far > > the best part of Debian. The best bit about it is its ability to > > get packages from multiple sources and always pick up the latest > > one. >

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread Bart Szyszka
> * apt (the tool to keep your distribution up to date), it is by far > the best part of Debian. The best bit about it is its ability to > get packages from multiple sources and always pick up the latest > one. What about up2date, though? I heard it was a program for Red Hat

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread Peter Ross
On 26-Oct-1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've used both Debian (at home) and Redhat (at work). > Both have reasonable tools for managing software (dpkg for Debian, rpm for > Redhat). > > I've also done upgrades for both Debian and Redhat. > The upgrade I did for Debian took

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread aphro
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, William T Wilson wrote: > DPT raid controller drivers, I know, are distributed in source form. I > cannot think of any reason they would work with a RedHat kernel and not a > Debian kernel, as RedHat doesn't (AFAIK) currently modify the kernel. well, http://www.dpt.com/tec

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread William T Wilson
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, aphro wrote: > - many software products are designed for it and don't support other > distributions, not just software(applications) but drivers too. examples > would be drivers for DPT raid controllers and 3com network adapters(the DPT raid controller drivers, I know, are d

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread Onno
[snip - BEWARE: out of context] i hear mandrake is good though, some have said mandrake is 'redhat done right' ..(somewhere along those lines) [snip - BEWARE: out of context] When an newbie asks me for a Linux distro I give them Mandrake and tell them they can get Debian from me when they are

Re: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread aphro
i choose debian because.. - it seems to have the largest number of developers - it has BY FAR the most binary packages (2000+ in slink 4000+ in potato) - it is well respected as being a stable and secure linux i have not, do not, and will not choose redhat because .. - many software products are

RE: just curious about Debian vs Redhat

1999-10-27 Thread Paul McHale
Charlie,   I am not sure what you mean by upgrade.  Debian offers a unique program called apt-get which will download and install any package in .deb format.  It also scans for packages which have been updated.  It then downloads and updates them automatically.  I haven't seen this in any ot