Thomas Kirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joerg Mueller wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> > I'm developing in Java and need at least jdk1.2, 1.3 would be better. Is
> > there any .deb package for this available? I can only find jdk1.1. Until
> > now I took the tarball from blackdown and installed it under /us
Joerg Mueller wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm developing in Java and need at least jdk1.2, 1.3 would be better. Is
> there any .deb package for this available? I can only find jdk1.1. Until
> now I took the tarball from blackdown and installed it under /usr/local,
> but of course this breaks many other package
Gary Hennigan wrote :
> Joerg Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm developing in Java and need at least jdk1.2, 1.3 would be better. Is
> > there any .deb package for this available? I can only find jdk1.1. Until
> > now I took the tarball from blackdown and installed it under /usr/local,
> The license forbids repackagin&redistribution so I guess someone has to
> take courage and make an installer-package (like realplayer).
>
So what could I do until such a package is available? Where do the other
packages want the libs and executables? Maybe its better to build the
correct d
Joerg Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm developing in Java and need at least jdk1.2, 1.3 would be better. Is
> there any .deb package for this available? I can only find jdk1.1. Until
> now I took the tarball from blackdown and installed it under /usr/local,
> but of course this breaks m
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:15:12 +0200, Joerg Mueller writes:
>I'm developing in Java and need at least jdk1.2, 1.3 would be better. Is
>there any .deb package for this available? I can only find jdk1.1. Until
>now I took the tarball from blackdown and installed it under /usr/local,
>but of course t
6 matches
Mail list logo
