Re: iw2 vs iw3 performance

2008-07-13 Thread Bob Cox
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 15:07:39 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Bob Cox wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 14:20:03 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >>> If you go to this page: >>> >>> http://shame.tuxfamily.org/repo/?cat=1 >>> >>> and scroll up and d

Re: iw2 vs iw3 performance

2008-07-13 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Bob Cox wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 14:20:03 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If you go to this page: http://shame.tuxfamily.org/repo/?cat=1 and scroll up and down the page, you will notice that in iw3 CPU busy hits over 90%, while in iw2 it does *not*. I'm sorry Hugo,

Re: iw2 vs iw3 performance

2008-07-13 Thread Bob Cox
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 14:20:03 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If you go to this page: > > http://shame.tuxfamily.org/repo/?cat=1 > > and scroll up and down the page, you will notice that in iw3 CPU busy > hits over 90%, while in iw2 it does *not*. I'm sorry Hugo, but I