>> "DS" == Darren Spiteri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I've installed hwtools*.deb to make use of irqtune but it doesn't seem
DS> to work
DS> properly. When I run irqtune it responds:
DS> irqtune: insmod failed on '/usr/lib/hwtools/irqtune_mod.o'
DS> A manual insmod reports:
DS> /usr/lib/hw
Serge Delorme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Problem is the module irqtune_mod.o won't load. Even when I do an
> ismod as root I have the same error message:
>
> "couldn't find the kernel version the module was compiled for"
There were some problems with with irqtune because hwtools has (had?) a
On Sat, 5 Jul 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
>
> When trying to start IRQTune, I get the following message:
> irqtune: setting system IRQ priority to 3/14 (Note: this was as expected)
> irqtune: insmod failed on `/usr/lib/hwtools/irqtune_mod.o`
>
> Trying to load this module manually gave me:
> ./irq
On 30 Jun, Hong Huang wrote:
>
> Got this error on my Debian 1.3 system:
>
> kernel: 2.0.30 compiled with loadable module support
>
> hwtools: 0.2-5
>
> moduils: 2.1.34-5
>
> Any idea what's wrong? Thanks
>
Yes.
This is from a mail I sent some time ago:
Apparently hwtools does not contain t
irqtune is a bit non standard, in that it has a module but it is not
preloaded. Just run irqtune and it loads the module itself.
If you installed hwtools, edit /etc/rc.boot/hwtools and uncomment the
irqtune line.
Lindsay
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
L
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Hong Huang wrote:
>
> Got this error on my Debian 1.3 system:
>
> kernel: 2.0.30 compiled with loadable module support
>
> hwtools: 0.2-5
>
> moduils: 2.1.34-5
>
> Any idea what's wrong? Thanks
>
Did you build and install the modules?
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-_-
On Tue, 3 Sep 1996, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 01 Sep 1996 11:12:42 +0300 Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i.FI) wrote:
>
> > In my never-ending battle to make the kernel behave well by default without
> > needing "irqtune" (which is very setup-specific, and as such not something
> >
On Sun, 01 Sep 1996 11:12:42 +0300 Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
i.FI) wrote:
> In my never-ending battle to make the kernel behave well by default without
> needing "irqtune" (which is very setup-specific, and as such not something
> the kernel can do automatically), I was thinking of doing
Hi again..
In my never-ending battle to make the kernel behave well by default without
needing "irqtune" (which is very setup-specific, and as such not something
the kernel can do automatically), I was thinking of doing interrupt priority
rotations instead of the current fixed mode.
Now, doing
> Just at a guess (and I don't know ppp internals that well), it
> might be PPP escaping the zero as a control character. If the
> software had to handle the escape sequence for "N thousand"
> nulls, it might bog it down a bit, and those escape sequences
> might themselves take up more space, as t
om [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 27 08:23:03 1996
>Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:08:43 +0300 (EET DST)
>From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Russell Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Gerry Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: irqtune: improve
On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Gerry Jensen wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> > Test I was done on a 2.0.14 kernel with a 100kb nul file (dd
> > if=/dev/zero...)
> > Test II was done on a 2.0.14 kernel with irqtune and a 100kb nul file.
> > Test III was done on a 2.0.15 kernel with a
On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Test I was done on a 2.0.14 kernel with a 100kb nul file (dd
> if=/dev/zero...)
> Test II was done on a 2.0.14 kernel with irqtune and a 100kb nul file.
> Test III was done on a 2.0.15 kernel with a 100kb nul file.
> Test IV was done on a 2.0.15 kernel
13 matches
Mail list logo
